What is the advantage of using JavaScript to determine a viable embedding
method over using alternative streams and fallback content that can include
the OBJECT element where appropriate?
Chris
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim Starling
On 11 Aug 2008, at 18:43, Aaron Boodman wrote:
On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 5:54 PM, Shannon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* each coroutine gets a real OS thread (if available).
snip
Coroutines in Lua are not operating system threads or processes.
Coroutines are blocks of Lua code which are created
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 7:47 PM, Kristof Zelechovski
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is the advantage of using JavaScript to determine a viable embedding
method over using alternative streams and fallback content that can include
the OBJECT element where appropriate?
video src=foo.ogg
fallback
--http://lua-users.org/wiki/CoroutinesTutorial
Is this description incorrect? It seems at odds with what you said
about Lua coroutines getting an OS thread (if one is available).
The description you quoted from lua-users.org is correct. The primary
implementation of Lua is 100% portable
On Fri, 1 Dec 2006, Michel Fortin wrote:
Le 1 déc. 2006 à 11:44, Ian Hickson a écrit :
On Fri, 1 Dec 2006, Michel Fortin wrote:
Okay, so if I understand well, xml:lang in the spec refers to the
lang attribute in the xml namespace, not to the xml:lang
attribute in the null
The attribute FORM.length is not parseable: it cannot be defined in the HTML
source and such definition should be ignored. The intrinsic computed length
attribute should take precedence over the imported control name which can be
retrieved calling form.elements.item(length).
Chris
-Original
A few questions and thoughts on the WebWorkers proposal:
If a WebWorker object is assigned to local variable inside a complex
script then it cannot be seen or stopped by the calling page. Should the
specification offer document.workers or getAllWorkers() as a means to
iterate over all
It is probably too late for that but I like the concept of a default
property much better than metaattributes like IndexGetter.
For example, document.forms(0) means call forms on document with argument
0. That is impossible because forms is not a function so we look into
forms collection and we
(to list)
-- Forwarded message --
From: Garrett Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 11:00 AM
Subject: Re: [whatwg] HTML 5 : Misconceptions Documented
To: Kristof Zelechovski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 4:53 AM, Kristof Zelechovski
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 4:50 AM, Shannon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If a WebWorker object is assigned to local variable inside a complex script
then it cannot be seen or stopped by the calling page. Should the
specification offer document.workers or getAllWorkers() as a means to
iterate over
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 8:24 AM, Kristof Zelechovski
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A very interesting post, too bad nobody from Google bothered to give an
exhaustive reply. Just a couple of thoughts below.
Just as an FYI, most of the Gears team is located in Mountain View
which is PST. This message
What stops a web page hogging ALL cores (deliberately or not)
and leaving no resources for the UI mouse or key actions required
to close the page?
Any modern operating system enforces this, using standard thread /
process task scheduling.
I know it's a vendor issue but should the spec at
[back to whatwg list.]
-- Forwarded message --
From: Garrett Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2008/8/12
Subject: Fwd: [whatwg] HTML 5 : Misconceptions Documented
To: CSS 3 W3C Group [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2008/8/12 Křištof Želechovski [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Another top post.
Reading the
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 3:35 AM, Kristof Zelechovski
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Falling back to another method of displaying media is possible without a
dedicated media API. In this particular case, you can have a video element
with an ogg source and an object running Cortado to display it.
I
On Fri, 29 Jun 2007, Darin Adler wrote:
On Jun 29, 2007, at 9:15 AM, Simon Pieters wrote:
For HTML elements in HTML documents, why is Element.localName
uppercased for tag names and lowercased for attribute names? I
wouldn't expect it to, and it makes it harder to write scripts that
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 3:46 PM, Chris Double [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
A browser that supports video but not Ogg will not use the fallback
object. Instead it will just give an error when loading the foo.ogg
file.
In this case I believe it would be possible to listen to the `error' event
and
On Tue, 10 Jul 2007, Simon Pieters wrote:
What about when there are illegal characters?
The DOM doesn't let you create those cases.
Sure it does. e.g. the DOM allows e.g. control characters in various
places that XML doesn't. I haven't looked into every production in XML
to see
Hey all --
I have a list of proposed additions to the Command API's:
http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#command
I was wondering if I could get some feedback on what I have:
http://blog.davglass.com/files/yui/html5
Thanks
Dav
Dav Glass
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
blog.davglass.com
On Tue, 12 Aug 2008, Dav Glass wrote:
I have a list of proposed additions to the Command API's:
http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#command
I was wondering if I could get some feedback on what I have:
http://blog.davglass.com/files/yui/html5
These are interesting
James Ide wrote:
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 3:46 PM, Chris Double
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A browser that supports video but not Ogg will not use the fallback
object. Instead it will just give an error when loading the foo.ogg
file.
In this case I believe
- Original Message
From: Ian Hickson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 12 Aug 2008, Dav Glass wrote:
* ModifiedNodes - I think this would be better as a separate API, maybe
queryCommandAffected() or something, that returns the collection.
Also, maybe it should return a range
21 matches
Mail list logo
