Re: [whatwg] workers

2008-09-15 Thread Aaron Boodman
Thinking about this some more, having the port convenience properties gets confusing when there are multiple clients sending messages, and doesn't make a whole lot of sense with shared workers. I think we should just get rid of these. It only adds one line of code to the simple case. Also, I

Re: [whatwg] workers

2008-09-15 Thread Chris Prince
I like this a lot. +1 to making connect() always explicit. Implicit creation of ports led to many rough edges. I think your proposal nearly works for window.postMessage() too. If you move 'onconnect' and 'connect()' into a MessageReceiver interface [better name TBD], and make Worker and Window

Re: [whatwg] HTML5 Offline Web Applications

2008-09-15 Thread Dave Camp
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 11:54 AM, Michael Nordman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Manifest file section headers: * BYPASS: list of url [namespaces/filters] * CACHE: list of exact [urls] * INTERCEPT: list of [urlnamespaces, namespace-handler url] * AUTOCACHE: list of [urlnamespaces,

Re: [whatwg] HTML5 Offline Web Applications

2008-09-15 Thread Michael Nordman
Hi Dave, Thanx for taking a look. On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 2:25 PM, Dave Camp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 11:54 AM, Michael Nordman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Manifest file section headers: * BYPASS: list of url [namespaces/filters] * CACHE: list of exact [urls] *