If the author wants to show only a sample of a resource and not the full
resource, I think she does it on purpose. It is not clear why it is vital
for the viewer to have an _obvious_ way to view the whole resource instead;
if it were the case, the author would provide for this.
IMHO,
Chris
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 6:42 PM, Silvia Pfeiffer
wrote:
> On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 2:25 AM, David Singer wrote:
>> At 23:15 +1000 30/04/09, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote:
>>>
>>> > On Thu, 30 Apr 2009, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 8 Apr 2009, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote:
> >>
> >> No
One of the use cases I collected from the e-mails sent in over the past
few months was the following:
USE CASE: Getting data out of poorly written Web pages, so that the user
can find more information about the page's contents.
SCENARIOS:
* Alfred merges data from various sources
Ian Hickson wrote:
On Mon, 4 May 2009, fantasai wrote:
Section 10.2.6, i.e. The XHTML syntax: Rendering: Punctuation and decoration
contains some style rules for handling the [rules] and [frames] attributes
of the element. I haven't reviewed it all in detail but this part
table[frames=void]
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 7:26 AM, Giovanni Campagna wrote:
> has an intrinsic size (like ,, and
> /), the other have not.
>
and usually have intrinsic sizes, but
// usually don't. often does and often does
not.
Rob
--
"He was pierced for our transgressions, he was crushed for our iniquities;
On Tue, 05 May 2009 00:16:50 +0200, ddailey
wrote:
Maybe I misunderstood (or, more precisely, I am about to state my
probable misunderstanding):
Does this mean for example, that the author could take a chunk of
code or its equivalent and pass it to canvas.drawImage() (and friends)
and t
On Thu, 30 Apr 2009 21:15:04 +0200, Ian Hickson wrote:
As far as I can tell this doesn't require any changes to HTML5, since the
same applies here as applies to a regular , right?
Anne van Kesteren replied:
Maybe you misunderstood, but the request was not about referencing
SVG, but passing a
On Mon, 4 May 2009, fantasai wrote:
>
> Section 10.2.6, i.e. The XHTML syntax: Rendering: Punctuation and decoration
> contains some style rules for handling the [rules] and [frames] attributes
> of the element. I haven't reviewed it all in detail but this part
>
> table[frames=void] > tr > td,
On Mon, 04 May 2009 23:52:21 +0200, fantasai
wrote:
[...]
Regardless of whether the effect of the rules is wrong, the name of the
attribute is frame, not frames, as far as I can tell.
--
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
Section 10.2.6, i.e. The XHTML syntax: Rendering: Punctuation and decoration
contains some style rules for handling the [rules] and [frames] attributes
of the element. I haven't reviewed it all in detail but this part
table[frames=void] > tr > td, table[frames=void] > tr > th,
table[frames=a
One thing XHTML(2) does not provide is resilience to invalid code, which is
very important for sites featuring third-party content like advertisements,
or user-generated content like blogs. Script-only add-ons like database
access and Web sockets in HTML5 are a big advantage for Web applications a
Microsoft Word has an option to save as filtered HTML; the result is almost
clean and almost valid, with a few exceptions, but it still not good.
However, the Word-specific stuff is gone, so you can focus on real problems.
HTH,
Chris
HTML5 elements live in the DOM, and markup creates two (preferable) ways to
persist HTML5 documents and fragments. But in principle you could persist
them as JSON equally well (probably making your site inaccessible to bots),
with a few framework exceptions just to bootstrap the browser. It is qu
Oliver writes:
>> I believe drawImage should be left as it currently is (basically taking
>> objects that are intrinsically bitmap-ish), and if we were to add an
>> ability
>> to draw an svg element into the canvas it should really be an simple
>> drawElement(Element) method instead, after all, why
On May 4, 2009, at 6:38 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Thu, 30 Apr 2009 21:15:04 +0200, Ian Hickson wrote:
As far as I can tell this doesn't require any changes to HTML5,
since the
same applies here as applies to a regular , right?
Maybe you misunderstood, but the request was not about
2009/5/4 Oliver Hunt :
>
> On May 4, 2009, at 6:38 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 30 Apr 2009 21:15:04 +0200, Ian Hickson wrote:
>>>
>>> As far as I can tell this doesn't require any changes to HTML5, since the
>>> same applies here as applies to a regular , right?
>>
>> Maybe you misun
On Fri, 01 May 2009 01:10:19 +0200, Ian Hickson wrote:
> I haven't renamed it. I don't think it's a big deal to introduce other
> interfaces that look the same but with different names, if we need to.
I agree that's not a problem, but the asymmetry between ImageData and
CanvasPixelArray would be
On Thu, 30 Apr 2009 21:15:04 +0200, Ian Hickson wrote:
> As far as I can tell this doesn't require any changes to HTML5, since the
> same applies here as applies to a regular , right?
Maybe you misunderstood, but the request was not about referencing SVG,
but passing an SVGSVGElement object dir
18 matches
Mail list logo
