Re: [whatwg] Web Sockets URL

2009-12-06 Thread 鵜飼文敏
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 8:38 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote: On Fri, 4 Dec 2009, Fumitoshi Ukai (榈~\椋兼~V~G鎫U~O) wrote: On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 10:55 AM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote: On Wed, 2 Dec 2009, Alexey Proskuryakov wrote: Currently, the Web Sockets API spec says that

[whatwg] WebSocket sub protocol name.

2009-12-06 Thread 鵜飼文敏
Hi, At 1.130 of The Web Socket API, it adds the sub-protocol name must be an ASCII string with no U+000A LINE FEED (LF) or U+000D CARRIAGE RETURN (CR) characters in it. But The Web Socket protocol 3.1 Parsing Web Socket URLs, says 1. If /protocol/ is specified but is either the empty string

Re: [whatwg] offscreen canvas /Access to canvas functionality from a worker

2009-12-06 Thread Sigbjorn Finne
On 12/5/2009 13:24, Franz Buchinger wrote: Gears introduced the concept of an offscreen canvas that doesn't draw anything in the browser window, but can be used to manipulate images in a web worker. I used this functionality to implement a resize-before-upload feature in my photo gallery

Re: [whatwg] [hybi] WebSocket sub protocol name.

2009-12-06 Thread Ian Hickson
On Mon, 7 Dec 2009, Fumitoshi Ukai (��~\飼�~V~G�~U~O) wrote: At 1.130 of The Web Socket API, it adds the sub-protocol name must be an ASCII string with no U+000A LINE FEED (LF) or U+000D CARRIAGE RETURN (CR) characters in it. But The Web Socket protocol 3.1 Parsing Web Socket URLs, says

Re: [whatwg] offscreen canvas /Access to canvas functionality from a worker

2009-12-06 Thread Oliver Hunt
On Dec 6, 2009, at 10:18 PM, Sigbjorn Finne wrote: On 12/5/2009 13:24, Franz Buchinger wrote: Gears introduced the concept of an offscreen canvas that doesn't draw anything in the browser window, but can be used to manipulate images in a web worker. I used this functionality to implement

Re: [whatwg] [hybi] WebSocket sub protocol name.

2009-12-06 Thread 鵜飼文敏
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 3:21 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote: On Mon, 7 Dec 2009, Fumitoshi Ukai (榈~\椋兼~V~G鎫U~O) wrote: At 1.130 of The Web Socket API, it adds the sub-protocol name must be an ASCII string with no U+000A LINE FEED (LF) or U+000D CARRIAGE RETURN (CR) characters in it.

Re: [whatwg] [hybi] WebSocket sub protocol name.

2009-12-06 Thread Ian Hickson
On Mon, 7 Dec 2009, Fumitoshi Ukai (��~\飼�~V~G�~U~O) wrote: On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 3:21 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote: On Mon, 7 Dec 2009, Fumitoshi Ukai (榈~\椋兼~V~G鎫U~O) wrote: At 1.130 of The Web Socket API, it adds the sub-protocol name must be an ASCII string with no U+000A

Re: [whatwg] [hybi] WebSocket sub protocol name.

2009-12-06 Thread Julian Reschke
Ian Hickson wrote: ... Control characters are allowed (though using them would be silly). Why are control characters (except LF and CR) allowed? There doesn't seem to be a good reason to exclude them, and excluding them would lead to a more complicated processing model. ... There isn't a

Re: [whatwg] [hybi] WebSocket sub protocol name.

2009-12-06 Thread 鵜飼文敏
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 4:26 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote: On Mon, 7 Dec 2009, Fumitoshi Ukai (�µ~\飼æ~V~Gæ~U~O) wrote: On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 3:21 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote: On Mon, 7 Dec 2009, Fumitoshi Ukai (榈~\椋兼~V~G鎫U~O) wrote: At 1.130 of The Web Socket API, it