Re: [whatwg] Adding ECMAScript 5 array extras to HTMLCollection (JZ and David Bruant)

2010-04-27 Thread David Bruant
Le 26/04/2010 11:25, Frank Migacz a écrit : What is the implication of denying dynamic changes to the HTMLCollection in a CORS environment? In some variant of Comet (or asynchronous UA polling), how can the UA implement change if it is regularly processing inside locked control blocks? I am

Re: [whatwg] Dealing with Stereoscopic displays

2010-04-27 Thread Eoin Kilfeather
Hi again, Thanks for the replies and informed feedback. I wasn't fully aware of the significance of the replicate proposal, and I like what it potential offers for my use case, but the hardware control problem remains. Essentially the UC is this; USE CASE: A web developer wants to utilise the

Re: [whatwg] Dealing with Stereoscopic displays

2010-04-27 Thread Robert O'Callahan
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 8:38 PM, Eoin Kilfeather ekilfeat...@dmc.dit.iewrote: * A user visits the National Museum site and wants to see a time-machine view of objects in the collection with a sense of 3D depth based on their age I think this is the closest you get to an actual use-case

Re: [whatwg] Adding ECMAScript 5 array extras to HTMLCollection

2010-04-27 Thread Geoffrey Sneddon
On 26/04/10 19:50, And Clover wrote: David Flanagan wrote: Rather that trying to make DOM collections feel like arrays, how about just giving them a toArray() method? I like that, as a practical and explicit (JavaScript-specific) binding. In the longer term, what's the thinking on a more

Re: [whatwg] Adding ECMAScript 5 array extras to HTMLCollection

2010-04-27 Thread David Bruant
Le 27/04/2010 03:54, Geoffrey Sneddon a écrit : On 26/04/10 19:50, And Clover wrote: David Flanagan wrote: Rather that trying to make DOM collections feel like arrays, how about just giving them a toArray() method? I like that, as a practical and explicit (JavaScript-specific) binding. In

Re: [whatwg] Ping + Ping-prefix meta element.

2010-04-27 Thread Roger Hågensen
On 2010-04-27 00:41, Aryeh Gregor wrote: On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 4:17 PM, Roger Hågensenresca...@emsai.net wrote: Oh, and could someone on the HTML5 list poke some of the guys over there and see if a ping attribute for the body tag in a similar vein could be considered? This *is*