On Sun, Jul 4, 2010 at 5:26 AM, silviapfeiffer1
silviapfeiff...@gmail.com wrote:
It doesn't actually matter what element the URI appears in - your
element has to deal with the data that it receives and if
file.ogv#t=1:00,1:15 is an Ogg Theora segment out of a video, then
that is what the img
Another way about handling this PPI ratio business would be with HTTP 300
multiple choice.
http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec10.html#sec10.3.1
This may not be the best answer for every image on a page, but the first
HTML page in a server controlled session could store the PPI ratio
Lachlan Hunt lachlan.h...@lachy.id.au wrote:
On 2010-07-02 21:01, John Harding wrote:
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 5:50 AM, Lachlan Huntlachlan.h...@lachy.id.auwrote:
As Henri pointed out, major content producers already broadcast their TV
shows and movies over the air without DRM.
On Sun, Jul 4, 2010 at 9:43 PM, timeless timel...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jul 4, 2010 at 5:26 AM, silviapfeiffer1
silviapfeiff...@gmail.com wrote:
It doesn't actually matter what element the URI appears in - your
element has to deal with the data that it receives and if
file.ogv#t=1:00,1:15
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 3:09 PM, John Harding jhard...@google.com wrote:
Yes, it's pretty straightforward to offer iframe-based embed code, but it
needs to be coupled with getting sites to accept them, or we end up with a
lot of confused, unhappy users.
This will only happen if the iframe
On Sun, Jul 4, 2010 at 9:19 AM, Silvia Pfeiffer
silviapfeiff...@gmail.com wrote:
All of the image formats that you are pointing out have an image mime
type. I am merely pointing out that to support ogg theora browsers
would need to support a video mime type in an img element. I don't
see that
On Sun, Jul 4, 2010 at 4:19 PM, Silvia Pfeiffer
silviapfeiff...@gmail.com wrote:
Note that I do understand the need and am trying to explain how it can
be made to work. Also I am trying to show that what might look as the
simplest approach won't work and why.
It doesn't have to be made to work
On 2010-07-04 14:34, Marques Johansson wrote:
Another way about handling this PPI ratio business would be with HTTP
300 multiple choice.
http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec10.html#sec10.3.1
This may not be the best answer for every image on a page, but the
first HTML page in a
On 4 July 2010 13:57, bjartur svartma...@gmail.com wrote:
I fail to see how BBC would be harmed by the usage of alternative
software. Its business model is about content, not software, right?
See, you're using logic and sense ... about half the BBC want to just
*make their stuff available*,
On Sun, 2010-07-04 at 23:56 +0100, David Gerard wrote:
On 4 July 2010 13:57, bjartur svartma...@gmail.com wrote:
I fail to see how BBC would be harmed by the usage of alternative
software. Its business model is about content, not software, right?
See, you're using logic and sense ...
On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 2:46 AM, Aryeh Gregor simetrical+...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jul 4, 2010 at 9:19 AM, Silvia Pfeiffer
silviapfeiff...@gmail.com wrote:
All of the image formats that you are pointing out have an image mime
type. I am merely pointing out that to support ogg theora browsers
On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 4:23 AM, timeless timel...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jul 4, 2010 at 4:19 PM, Silvia Pfeiffer
silviapfeiff...@gmail.com wrote:
Note that I do understand the need and am trying to explain how it can
be made to work. Also I am trying to show that what might look as the
Aryeh Gregor simetrical+...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jul 4, 2010 at 9:19 AM, Silvia Pfeiffer
silviapfeiff...@gmail.com wrote:
All of the image formats that you are pointing out have an image mime
type. I am merely pointing out that to support ogg theora browsers
would need to support a
David Gerard dger...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4 July 2010 13:57, bjartur svartma...@gmail.com wrote:
I fail to see how BBC would be harmed by the usage of alternative
software. Its business model is about content, not software, right?
See, you're using logic and sense ... about half the BBC
Hi All,
I'm sure link relations have already had many debates around how they should
work and the exact use case that they cover.
I'd like to add another card to the deck :-)
When using link relations on an a tag, one would find it useful to have
next and previous link relations, this is
On 7/4/10, Ben Schwarz ben.schw...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
[...]
However, as far as my understanding goes, linkrels should not contain
multiple values; eg:
a rel=prefetch nextNext page/a
Why not? They can in HTML4.
http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/struct/links.html#adef-rel
rel =
Should window.name be [Replaceable]?
There are a number of [Replaceable] [1] properties on the window
object. However, window.name is not marked as such [2]. Not being
marked as replaceable means that if authors use a global variable
named name it will be coerced into a string. For many this
On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 12:05 AM, Joseph Pecoraro pecor...@apple.com wrote:
- I didn't have access to IE to test. I'd appreciate
someone giving it a shot to see how they act.
On IE8 it is printing string,string,string
And it looks like in Firefox
1) name = with_a_number changes type to
On Jul 4, 2010, at 9:35 PM, Biju wrote:
On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 12:05 AM, Joseph Pecoraro pecor...@apple.com wrote:
- I didn't have access to IE to test. I'd appreciate
someone giving it a shot to see how they act.
On IE8 it is printing string,string,string
Thanks for checking! So
On 7/4/10, timeless timel...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 6:27 AM, Garrett Smith dhtmlkitc...@gmail.com
wrote:
This attribute describes the relationship from the current
document to the anchor specified by the href attribute. The value of
this attribute is a space-separated list
20 matches
Mail list logo
