On 2010-08-28, at 12:59 AM, Nils Dagsson Moskopp wrote:
> "E.J. Zufelt" schrieb am Sat, 28 Aug 2010 00:54:06
> -0400:
>
>> […]
>>
>> I am rather new to this list and am curious if anytime recently there
>> has been discussion about adding tabstrip and tab elements to the
>> html5 spec? The con
"E.J. Zufelt" schrieb am Sat, 28 Aug 2010 00:54:06
-0400:
> […]
>
> I am rather new to this list and am curious if anytime recently there
> has been discussion about adding tabstrip and tab elements to the
> html5 spec? The concept of a tabstrip is a rather commonly used UI
> component on the w
Good evening,
I am rather new to this list and am curious if anytime recently there has been
discussion about adding tabstrip and tab elements to the html5 spec? The
concept of a tabstrip is a rather commonly used UI component on the web
(web-applications, content management systems, facetted
WebKit has added the input event to contentEditable nodes. That part of this
proposal seemed non-controversial. Do other browser vendors support changing
the description of this event to apply to contentEditable nodes as well?
Ojan
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 5:33 PM, Ojan Vafai wrote:
> I've start
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 4:03 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
> Ok, I've changed popstate to get fired (or queued up, if before 'load')
> for every traversal, not just those to non-null states.
Thanks, http://html5.org/tools/web-apps-tracker?from=5376&to=5377
looks good to me.
> BTW, there's another probl
On Wed, 25 Aug 2010, Mihai Parparita wrote:
>
> [...] it seems like the (web) developer's mental model for popstate
> would be much simpler if it fired whenever the current session history
> entry changed, regardless of whether it has a state object or was the
> first entry. Then if someone wish
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 11:21 AM, Ian Hickson wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Aug 2010, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> >
> > With the current model makingyourinterwebsboring.com can define a cache
> > manifest and basically point to a lot of external news sites. When any
> > of those sites is then fetched direct
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 2:44 PM, Aryeh Gregor wrote:
> > PHP offers no JS-string-literal-escape function. `addslashes` is very close,
> > but won't handle some cases with non-ASCII characters correctly. Better to
> > use `json_encode` to transfer the string, then write as text:
> >
> > elmt.tex
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 6:32 AM, Hugh Guiney wrote:
> But, I thought XHTML5 was just an XML serialization of HTML5, so why
> is this the case? I just read the rationale behind it, but despite not
> being best practice shouldn't it be at the very least allowed?
This is guesswork on my part, but ma
2010/8/26 Kornel Lesiński :
> Inside strings you replace " for "/"), outside strings you'd need to add space between " case x You might also use .
Hmm, that's an idea. It will only work if you want to do it to the
whole script blob, though (like if it's trusted but might contain
"" by mistake).
On Fri, 27 Aug 2010, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
>
> With the current model makingyourinterwebsboring.com can define a cache
> manifest and basically point to a lot of external news sites. When any
> of those sites is then fetched directly they would be taken from the
> cache. That does not seem op
Anne van Kesteren wrote:
With the current model makingyourinterwebsboring.com can define a cache
manifest and basically point to a lot of external news sites. When any
of those sites is then fetched directly they would be taken from the
cache. That does not seem optimal.
Seems handy if you wa
With the current model makingyourinterwebsboring.com can define a cache
manifest and basically point to a lot of external news sites. When any of
those sites is then fetched directly they would be taken from the cache.
That does not seem optimal.
--
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren
On 27.08.2010 12:32, Hugh Guiney wrote:
Ah, thanks. I guess the error is just confusing then in that it calls
it "XHTML element noscript", which led me to think that it was indeed
part of XHTML. I think some indication otherwise might prove
beneficial to users.
But, I thought XHTML5 was just an
Ah, thanks. I guess the error is just confusing then in that it calls
it "XHTML element noscript", which led me to think that it was indeed
part of XHTML. I think some indication otherwise might prove
beneficial to users.
But, I thought XHTML5 was just an XML serialization of HTML5, so why
is this
I'm authoring an XHTML host document with namespaced inline SVG and
XLink. I have vector images that recur throughout the site. I'd like
to implement SVG's and to reduce the file size of the
document and keep style separate from content, as with CSS.
If I put an SVG tree with anywhere in the XH
On 08/24/2010 11:38 PM, Adam Barth wrote:
This seems related to the "magic iframe" concept that was recently
added in WebKit. Basically, magic iframe lets you move an iframe from
one document to another without blowing away the JavaScript/DOM state
of the iframe.
One thing not too clear in the
On Fri, 27 Aug 2010 11:10:44 +0200, Hugh Guiney
wrote:
I am using noscript as permitted, "In a head element of an HTML
document, if there are no ancestor noscript elements." but still
getting an error from Validator.nu saying it's not allowed.
is HTML-only. I.e. not allowed in XHTML.
--
An
On 27.08.2010 00:45, Adam Barth wrote:
...
Escaping just those character is insufficient. The appeal of this
approach is that authors don't need the right blacklist of dangerous
characters. By the way, there are already folks doing something
similar manually now. They send the untrusted bytes
I am using noscript as permitted, "In a head element of an HTML
document, if there are no ancestor noscript elements." but still
getting an error from Validator.nu saying it's not allowed.
Settings:
Encoding: as set by server/page
Schemas: http://s.validator.nu/xhtml5-aria-rdf-svg-mathml.rnc
http
20 matches
Mail list logo