On 11/21/2010 4:12 PM, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 9:59 AM, Charles Pritchard ch...@jumis.com
mailto:ch...@jumis.com wrote:
Rob: Mobile deployments using dpiPixelRatio (as has been adopted
by Moz and Webkit) and target-DpiDensity work well on the mobile,
they
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 10:14 PM, Charles Pritchard ch...@jumis.com wrote:
window.dpiPixelRatio does not change.
Is it mozDpiPixelRatio ?
There is no such property.
Rob
--
Now the Bereans were of more noble character than the Thessalonians, for
they received the message with great
On 11/24/2010 1:12 AM, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 9:09 PM, Charles Pritchard ch...@jumis.com
mailto:ch...@jumis.com wrote:
On 11/21/2010 4:12 PM, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 9:59 AM, Charles Pritchard
ch...@jumis.com
Sorry about that, devicePixelRatio
On 11/24/2010 1:14 AM, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 10:14 PM, Charles Pritchard ch...@jumis.com
mailto:ch...@jumis.com wrote:
window.dpiPixelRatio does not change.
Is it mozDpiPixelRatio ?
There is no such property.
Rob
--
Now
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=486200
Come on Robert:
It needs to be chrome-only because I don't want Web authors to have
easy access
to information about screen pixels. They'll try to defeat our zooming or
size
things to screen pixels, which we don't want.
They defeat your
Dear Mike, HTML5,
The Media Fragments WG has issued a Last Call WD a couple of month ago
and would welcome comments from the HTML WG on its entire specification
Media Fragments URI 1.0 located at
http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-media-frags-20100408. If you plan to send
comments, please let us
Charles Pritchard wrote:
TV use-cases seem like they'll become more prevalent, with Apple and Google
and their devices.
Apple TV doesn't have legacy connectors--only HDMI. A quick look at the specs
of Google TV devices suggests that Google TV devices are also HDMI-only.
The devices sold as
On 11/16/2010 04:35 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
Actually, that specific problem was addressed long ago based on feedback
from us:
Constraint validation: If an element has a maximum allowed value
length, and its dirty value flag is true, and the code-point length of
the element's value is
I'm investigating how TimedTracks can be used for in-band-data-tracks within
MPEG transport streams (used for cable television).
In this format, the number and types of in-band-data-tracks can change over
time. So, for example, when the programming switches from a football game to a
movie, an
On 11/24/10 4:13 AM, Charles Pritchard wrote:
And, these aren't great lengths. It's about 6 lines of javascript.
Uh... That depends on how your drawing path is set up. If I understand
correctly what you're doing, you have to get the DPI ration (call it N),
change the canvas width/height by a
On 11/24/2010 10:23 AM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
On 11/24/10 4:13 AM, Charles Pritchard wrote:
And, these aren't great lengths. It's about 6 lines of javascript.
Uh... That depends on how your drawing path is set up. If I understand
correctly what you're doing, you have to get the DPI ration
On 11/24/10 1:26 PM, Charles Pritchard wrote:
But the upshot is that people make mistakes. If you don't assume they
will, you come to grief.
Assuming they'll make mistakes is different than having zero faith in
their competence.
I have zero faith in across-the-board competence.
That is,
On 11/24/2010 10:56 AM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
On 11/24/10 1:26 PM, Charles Pritchard wrote:
But the upshot is that people make mistakes. If you don't assume they
will, you come to grief.
Assuming they'll make mistakes is different than having zero faith in
their competence.
I have zero faith
On 2010/11/24 18:38 (GMT-0800) Charles Pritchard composed:
I've only asked that information be made available. The response from your group seems to
be you can't handle the truth!
As a non-UA developer spectating since the beginning of this thread, my take
on what you're asking for is it
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 4:38 PM, Charles Pritchard ch...@jumis.com wrote:
I greatly appreciate the value of standards, but I am at the same time, very
sensitive to the effects that centrally planned restrictions have on groups.
The aggregate effect is one where tens of millions are harmed by
On 11/24/2010 2:45 PM, Aryeh Gregor wrote:
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 4:38 PM, Charles Pritchardch...@jumis.com wrote:
I greatly appreciate the value of standards, but I am at the same time, very
sensitive to the effects that centrally planned restrictions have on groups.
The aggregate effect is
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 4:24 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com wrote:
On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 19:50:42 +0100, Per-Erik Brodin
per-erik.bro...@ericsson.com wrote:
We are about to start implementing stream.record() and StreamRecorder. The
spec currently says that “the file must be in a format
1. Can we deprecate alert(), confirm(), prompt() ?
At present many web2.0 js libs are providing alternate [and cool
looking] methods to achieve use cases where we need to use alert(),
confirm(), prompt(). So do we need those modal dialogs any longer?
2. if we are still keeping them, can we
Biju bijumaill...@gmail.com schrieb am Thu, 25 Nov 2010 02:29:31
-0400:
1. Can we deprecate alert(), confirm(), prompt() ?
At present many web2.0 js libs are providing alternate [and cool
looking] methods to achieve use cases where we need to use alert(),
confirm(), prompt(). So do we need
Silvia Pfeiffer silviapfeiff...@gmail.com schrieb am Thu, 25 Nov 2010
14:05:18 +1100:
Can the decision for a file format be taken completely separately from
the codec decision for the audio or video element, I wonder?
I believe the royalties for encoders are usually higher than the
royalties
I'm not sure what your definition of web 2.0 is, but its not about the way
something looks.
Removing those modal dialogues would be a very bad idea indeed. There are still
valid uses for them, even if they have been abused in the past. Thinking your
way, we ought to get rid of the ability to
21 matches
Mail list logo
