On Thu, 12 Aug 2010, Mihai Parparita wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 4:56 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
> > On Tue, 27 Jul 2010, Mihai Parparita wrote:
> > > https://webkit.org/b/42861 has more tests, but briefly, the behavior
> > > in the latest stable versions of these browser is:
> > > - Firefox will
On 11/29/2010 1:53 PM, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
On Mon, 2010-11-29 at 10:40 -0800, Charles Pritchard wrote:
> Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 15:54:04 +0100
> From: Christoph P?permailto:christoph.pae...@crissov.de>>
> To: whatwg groupmailto:whatwg@lists.whatwg.org>>
> Subject: Re: [whatwg] Exposing sp
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 1:53 PM, Ashley Sheridan
wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-11-29 at 10:40 -0800, Charles Pritchard wrote:
>
> > Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 15:54:04 +0100
> > From: Christoph P?per
> > To: whatwg group
> > Subject: Re: [whatwg] Exposing spelling/grammar suggestions in
> > contentEditab
On Mon, 2010-11-29 at 10:40 -0800, Charles Pritchard wrote:
> > Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 15:54:04 +0100
> > From: Christoph P?per
> > To: whatwg group
> > Subject: Re: [whatwg] Exposing spelling/grammar suggestions in
> > contentEditable
> > Message-ID:<62959690-0e26-4bbc-ab4f-f9726f24c...@criss
On 11/27/2010 2:50 AM, Ian Hickson wrote:
On Fri, 26 Nov 2010, Charles Pritchard wrote:
I want to suggestion a reason for this impasse: the WHATWG intends to
produce a scene-graph specification. Other activities are out of scope.
I'm not sure what you really mean by "scene-graph specification",
Currently, there's no way for an author to markup spelling errors in text.
A [spelling] tag would address that deficiency.
This could be used for a number of reasons, from [sic]-style
annotations, to conveying to the user that an area is misspelled using
the same visual cues as contenteditable.
Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 15:54:04 +0100
From: Christoph P?per
To: whatwg group
Subject: Re: [whatwg] Exposing spelling/grammar suggestions in
contentEditable
Message-ID:<62959690-0e26-4bbc-ab4f-f9726f24c...@crissov.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Charles Pritchard:
> A meth
On 11/28/2010 11:30 PM, Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis wrote:
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 4:19 AM, Charles Pritchard wrote:
What breach is enabled by using a limited spell check?
(What does “limited” mean?)
If script can programmaticaly get at the spell check results, then it
exposes whether particular wo
On 11/29/2010 1:49 AM, timeless wrote:
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 5:57 AM, Charles Pritchard wrote:
A method for triggering a system/ua spell check via execCommand
would be a small step forward. Is that something already available?
Afaik, it was canned from the early MS model.
Bringing up syste
On 11/25/10 9:10 AM, Philip Jägenstedt wrote:
Based on this, unless there are corner-cases I've missed, it seems
unlikely that there's a large body of web content that depends on inline
javascript: URLs executing. My current plan is to try completely
blocking javascript: URLs in the contexts ment
On Thu, 04 Nov 2010 01:20:37 +0100, Mounir Lamouri
wrote:
Currently, when a radio button is required, it will suffer from being
missing if no radio elements in the radio button group is checked.
However, radio elements in the group will not suffer from being missing
if they do not have the requ
On Fri, 26 Nov 2010 19:01:40 +0100, Per-Erik Brodin
wrote:
A Stream can be treated as an abstract representation of a media stream.
When a Stream is to be transported over a peer-to-peer connection, the
format can be negotiated between the peers. In the current
ConnectionPeer API, such for
On Sat, 27 Nov 2010 21:26:58 +0100, Silvia Pfeiffer
wrote:
As for choosing a single codec - if we end up not being able to agree
on a single compressed codec for audio/video streaming, we will get
into a situation where all your involved parties in a video or audio
conference have to use the sa
On Sun, 28 Nov 2010 17:27:30 +0100, Adrian Sutton
wrote:
On 28 Nov 2010, at 15:52, Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis wrote:
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 3:41 PM, Adrian Sutton
wrote:
User's expect a rich text editor
to override the browser default context menu to provide things like
properties for images,
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 5:57 AM, Charles Pritchard wrote:
> A method for triggering a system/ua spell check via execCommand
> would be a small step forward. Is that something already available?
> Afaik, it was canned from the early MS model.
Bringing up system dialogs is scary/surprising and co
Am 28.11.2010 17:27 schrieb Adrian Sutton:
On 28 Nov 2010, at 15:52, Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis wrote:
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 3:41 PM, Adrian Sutton
mailto:adrian.sut...@ephox.com>> wrote:
User's expect a rich text editor
to override the browser default context menu to provide things like
propertie
16 matches
Mail list logo
