On Wed, 25 Aug 2010, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
On 8/25/10 9:37 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
Note that this issue means that using atob or btoa for dealing with
this is a huge pain if non-ASCII chars are involved, since those take
and return byte arrays masquerading as JS strings, not actual
On Tue, 01 Feb 2011 07:47:26 +0100, Kenneth Russell k...@google.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 3:10 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Fri, 7 Jan 2011, David Flanagan wrote:
The structured clone algorithm currently allows ImageData and Blob
objects to be cloned but doesn't mention
chkrrchn...@aol.com,recghongr...@yahoo.com,rechongr...@hotmail.com,rechonyiaonakagr...@googlegroups.com,rech...@ovi.com
--
R.C.O
Thanks, you save my life!!
Btw i'd reli like the onpopstate to fire as early as possible, possibly
before images are requested/dom is fully loaded. But this is already great
enough :D
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 10:32 AM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 6:18 PM,
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 3:28 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Fri, 13 Aug 2010, Patrick Mueller wrote:
On 8/12/10 6:29 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
On Wed, 19 May 2010, Patrick Mueller wrote:
I've been playing with application cache for a while now, and found
the diagnostic
On 2/1/11 11:47 AM, Adam de Boor wrote:
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 3:28 PM, Ian Hicksoni...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Fri, 13 Aug 2010, Patrick Mueller wrote:
On 8/12/10 6:29 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
On Wed, 19 May 2010, Patrick Mueller wrote:
I've been playing with application cache for a while now,
On 2/1/11 5:19 AM, Simon Pieters wrote:
While you're discussing efficient handoff of ArrayBuffer, do you also
keep in mind efficient handoff of other objects (e.g. ImageData) as
discussed in this thread?:
http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/2011-January/029885.html
For what
Problem Statement:
Loading JavaScript onto a page poses several performance issues. With a regular
script tag, the UA waits for download and then waits for execution. The defer
attribute helps by not blocking on download and deferring execution until later
but preserves execution order; the
On Tue, 01 Feb 2011 18:36:19 +0100, Boris Zbarsky bzbar...@mit.edu wrote:
On 2/1/11 5:19 AM, Simon Pieters wrote:
While you're discussing efficient handoff of ArrayBuffer, do you also
keep in mind efficient handoff of other objects (e.g. ImageData) as
discussed in this thread?:
On Feb 1, 2011, at 10:04 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Tue, 01 Feb 2011 18:36:19 +0100, Boris Zbarsky bzbar...@mit.edu wrote:
On 2/1/11 5:19 AM, Simon Pieters wrote:
While you're discussing efficient handoff of ArrayBuffer, do you also
keep in mind efficient handoff of other objects (e.g.
? The ability to separate download and execution is a trend that has not
only emerged, but continues to be explored. There are problems with the
previous solutions, the biggest of which (in the case of #1 and #2) is the
reliance on the browser caching behavior which may, in some instances, lead
I almost completely agree with you. The major issue I have with the way the
spec is written is that there is no way to feature detect this capability. I'd
like this behavior (which I agree, is useful), to be more explicit so we can
easily make use where available.
-Nicholas
No comments so far on this issue so I'll describe it a bit more.
Consequences of the current text are that resource fetches are
canceled for a document when navigating away from it, even if
the user then chooses to cancel the navigation at a
beforeunload prompt and returns to the document.
Best
? The major issue I have with the way the spec is written is that there is
no way to feature detect this capability. I'd like this behavior (which I
agree, is useful), to be more explicit so we can easily make use where
available.
I agree, the spec doesn't make it clear in its current wording
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com wrote:
On Tue, 01 Feb 2011 18:36:19 +0100, Boris Zbarsky bzbar...@mit.edu wrote:
On 2/1/11 5:19 AM, Simon Pieters wrote:
While you're discussing efficient handoff of ArrayBuffer, do you also
keep in mind efficient handoff of
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 11:08 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@opera.com wrote:
On Tue, 01 Feb 2011 18:36:19 +0100, Boris Zbarsky bzbar...@mit.edu wrote:
On 2/1/11 5:19 AM, Simon Pieters wrote:
While you're discussing
On Thu, 9 Sep 2010, Henri Sivonen wrote:
On Sep 9, 2010, at 00:47, Ian Hickson wrote:
On Fri, 3 Sep 2010, Henri Sivonen wrote:
When evaluating a parser-inserted script, there are three potential
script global objects to use:
1) The script global object of the document whose active
On 2/1/11 1:04 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Tue, 01 Feb 2011 18:36:19 +0100, Boris Zbarsky bzbar...@mit.edu wrote:
For what it's worth, in Gecko that's the same thing, since imagedata
is just a typed array in our implementation.
ImageData.data you mean?
Yes.
I wonder if we can still
18 matches
Mail list logo
