Re: [whatwg] Ongoing work on an editing commands (execCommand()) specification

2011-03-18 Thread Ehsan Akhgari
On 11-03-04 10:23 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 3:58 AM, Aryeh Gregorwrote: > >> On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 5:45 PM, Ryosuke Niwa wrote: >>> >>> Backward compatibility. I suspect that there are many web contents that >>> depend on styleWithCSS available on WebKit / Gecko. >> >> G

Re: [whatwg] Ongoing work on an editing commands (execCommand()) specification

2011-03-18 Thread Ehsan Akhgari
On 11-03-02 2:18 PM, Aryeh Gregor wrote: >> >> Styling a Range / Unstyling a Range doesn't seem to split the range into >> segments of phrasing contents. How does your algorithm avoid wrapping a >> non-phrasing element with a span? (e.g. we don't want to wrap div, >> blockquote, etc... with a span

Re: [whatwg] Ongoing work on an editing commands (execCommand()) specification

2011-03-18 Thread Ehsan Akhgari
Hi everyone. Firstly, I'm very happy to see some action in this area, and sorry that I'm catching up with the thread with a delay. I'll try to respond to individual messages where I have something to say, to make following the thread easier. On 11-03-13 4:46 PM, Aryeh Gregor wrote: > > I did som

[whatwg] CSS5 anyone? Or a WHATWG CSS3 Working Group would be cool too

2011-03-18 Thread Martin Alterisio
I hope I'm not stepping on a tabooed topic here... It's just that I wish that someone would do to CSS what you guys did to HTML. I respect the work being done by the W3C CSS Working Group but it just doesn't fell enough. It doesn't feel open enough, nor fast enough. I really want to see a version

Re: [whatwg] PeerConnection: encryption feedback

2011-03-18 Thread Glenn Maynard
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 11:28 PM, Ian Hickson wrote: > The other ICE peer, the STUN server, the TURN server (if any), and the > signaling channel are all under the control of the attacker in a worst > case scenario (the user being directed to a hostile or hijacked site). The > attacker essentiall

Re: [whatwg] PeerConnection: encryption feedback

2011-03-18 Thread Ian Hickson
On Fri, 18 Mar 2011, Glenn Maynard wrote: > > It's possible that ICE doesn't actually negotiate this securely, since > the STUN server itself is untrusted. Do you (or anyone else) know if > STUN negotiation is secure under these circumstances? Or do you think > it doesn't matter? The other I

Re: [whatwg] Proposal for @label attribute associated with kind=metadata TimedTextTracks

2011-03-18 Thread Silvia Pfeiffer
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 6:29 AM, Eric Winkelman wrote: > Use Case: > > Many video streams contain in-band metadata for application signaling, and > other uses.  By using this metadata, a web page can synchronize an > application with the delivered video, or provide other synchronized services. >

[whatwg] Contradictory description of online whitelist prefixes

2011-03-18 Thread Nikolas Coukouma
Section 6.6.2 "Application caches" says Zero or more URLs that form the online whitelist namespaces. These are used as prefix match patterns, and declare URLs that the user agent will never load from the cache but will instead always attempt to obtain from the network. The above doesn't seem

Re: [whatwg] PeerConnection: encryption feedback

2011-03-18 Thread Glenn Maynard
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 9:28 PM, Adam Barth wrote: > So, the salt and the nonce play different roles. The salt is to make > sure the message appears random if you haven't read the spec (and so > don't know the salt). The nonce is to prevent the attacker from > crafting plaintexts that encrypt t

[whatwg] Proposal for @label attribute associated with kind=metadata TimedTextTracks

2011-03-18 Thread Eric Winkelman
Use Case: Many video streams contain in-band metadata for application signaling, and other uses. By using this metadata, a web page can synchronize an application with the delivered video, or provide other synchronized services. An example of this type of metadata is EISS ( http://www.cablela

Re: [whatwg] Peer-to-peer communication, video conferencing, , and related topics

2011-03-18 Thread Lachlan Hunt
On 2011-03-18 15:14, Olli Pettay wrote: On 03/18/2011 04:02 PM, Lachlan Hunt wrote: This is basically what Philip and I were discussing in the other thread yesterday, where we avoid the unnecessary overhead of creating a magic URL, and instead just assign the object directly to the src property.

Re: [whatwg] Peer-to-peer communication, video conferencing, , and related topics

2011-03-18 Thread Olli Pettay
On 03/18/2011 04:02 PM, Lachlan Hunt wrote: On Mon, 24 Jan 2011, Anne van Kesteren wrote: There is a plan of allowing direct assigning to IDL attributes besides creating URLs. I.e. being able to do: audio.src = blob (The src content attribute would then be something like "about:objecturl".)

Re: [whatwg] Peer-to-peer communication, video conferencing, , and related topics

2011-03-18 Thread Lachlan Hunt
On 2011-03-18 05:45, Ian Hickson wrote: On Thu, 16 Sep 2010, Jonathan Dixon wrote: Further, it could be useful to provide a way to query the video source as to whether the camera is oriented relative to the screen (if the underlying system knows; consider a phone device with both a main camera a

Re: [whatwg] Form input element for value-unit pairs

2011-03-18 Thread Christoph Päper
Markus Ernst: > Am 15.03.2011 17:36 schrieb Christoph Päper: >> >> >> >> >> > > What I do not yet understand is, in what point does this proposal enhance > usability compared to a dropdown box with the units, and some client side > script that does the conversion? The less fo

Re: [whatwg] Ongoing work on an editing commands (execCommand()) specification

2011-03-18 Thread Tim Down
On 18 March 2011 00:43, Aryeh Gregor wrote: > On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 6:45 PM, Tim Down wrote: >> I'm interested in this stuff and am very grateful for your work. I've >> been writing a document.execCommand() replacement for my Rangy library >> (http://code.google.com/p/rangy/), so this is all ex