There is a lot more that could be done than simply triggering the flash.
See /The Frankencamera: An Experimental Platform for Computational
Photography/ http://graphics.stanford.edu/papers/fcam/ and The FCAM
API http://fcam.garage.maemo.org/.
Regards
-Mark
On 26/07/2011 14:30, Ian Hickson
25.07.2011 22:02, Ian Hickson wrote:
So what markup should we use for E = mc�, given that by the applicable
standards, E, M, and c should appear in italics and the other characters as
normal (upright)?
It sounds like you want to use these characters:
U+1D438 MATHEMATICAL ITALIC CAPITAL E
Anne van Kesteren:
I'm still trying to get HTML and browsers to change so that attribute values
always match case-sensitively, irrespective of markup language. The current
magic attribute list in HTML whose values needs to be matched ASCII
case-insensitively is just ugly.
Can’t that be
http://www.google.com/support/news_pub/bin/answer.py?answer=93994
See Link above, Google says, that they provide DC.date.issued, but this
is also not part auf the whatwg metaextensions list.
kind regards
Aykut
Am 18.07.11 16:11 schrieb Julian Reschke unter julian.resc...@gmx.de:
On
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 07:30, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
If you send two MediaStream objects constructed from the same
LocalMediaStream over a PeerConnection there needs to be a way to
separate them on the receiving side.
What's the use case for sending the same feed twice?
Hello All:
Just a quick report on a DOMCrypt meeting that took place Thursday, 2011-07-14
at Mozilla in Mountain View.
Summary:
DOMCrypt is a high-level API that should be usable by web developers after
a short period of study
DOMCrypt will be designed and implemented so that it is
- Reply message -
From: Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch
Date: Tue, Jul 26, 2011 1:30 am
Subject: [whatwg] PeerConnection, MediaStream, getUserMedia(), and other
feedback
To: wha...@whatwg.org wha...@whatwg.org
Since February, I've been working on writing a detailed specification
for browser editing, primarily the document.execCommand() and
document.queryCommand*() methods. These were created by Microsoft in
the 1990s and were subsequently adopted in some form by all other
browsers, and today browsers
On Fri, 29 Apr 2011, Simon Heckmann wrote:
I have read a lot in the last month about the future of html and web
applications and I am very impressed by the progress this makes.
However, I have come across some thing that annoys me: Permissions. I
know they are important and I know they
If I understand this correctly, then this is introducing a mechanism
for Web publishers to provide a secure service to users where the data
exchanged between the server and the UA is encrypted and not decodable
by anyone else listening in on that communication or getting access to
the data stored
On Tue, 13 Mar 2007, Sean Hogan wrote:
How do you define style for datagrids?
e.g.
- row color
- alternating row color
- selected row color
- initial column widths
- fixed column widths
For the time being, I have abandoned the idea of specifying a datagrid
element. My plan is to wait to
Silvia:
The design - at this time - allows the client to encrypt data locally, with the
publicKey of the recipient - not allowing anyone else to read the data. The
callback that the web page provides which captures the decrypted data has full
access to the decoded data.
I imagine the DRM
OK, so it would apply to a private video conference, but not to
protect a server-client-delivery. That's good to know, thanks.
Silvia.
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 8:26 AM, David Dahl dd...@mozilla.com wrote:
Silvia:
The design - at this time - allows the client to encrypt data locally, with
the
Okay, I am a little confused now: What about the following use case:
On the server: Encrypt a file using AES-256 with a MD5 hash of the user's
password.
On the client: Download the file and save it on the hard drive using the File
API. Some time later when offline the user can then enter their
Hi,
sorry for posting across multiple groups, but I hope you'll see from my
comments below that this is really needed.
This is definitely not intended as criticism of any of the work going
on. It's intended as constructive feedback that hopefully provides
clarification on a key use case and
Hi Simon,
That would look something like the following:
== Phase 1: Key Generation (Client-Side) ==
crypto.pk.generateKeypair(rsa-1024-aes-128, function(keyID, pubKey) {
... send pubKey to the server ...
... store keyID somewhere??? ...
});
== Phase 2: Encryption (Server-Side) ==
The
- Original Message
From: Simon Heckmann si...@simonheckmann.de
To: Silvia Pfeiffer silviapfeiff...@gmail.com
Cc: David Dahl dd...@mozilla.com, WHATWG Proposals
whatwg@lists.whatwg.org
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2011 5:55:30 PM
Subject: Re: [whatwg] DOMCrypt update: July 14 Meeting
17 matches
Mail list logo
