On Mon, 26 Sep 2011, Ojan Vafai wrote:
>
> *"8.3.2 Focus management*
>
> An element is *focusable* if the user agent's default behavior allows it to
> be focusable or if the element is specially focusable, but only if the
> element is either being rendered or is a descendant of a canvas element t
On Sat, 8 Oct 2011, Kaustubh Atrawalkar wrote:
>
> In a form element, If a form input element has a focus and its then made
> hidden using style property display:none the focus still remains on the
> hidden element. According to specs (
> http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multip
On 2/21/12 10:47 PM, Dimitri Glazkov wrote:
I made WebKit match this behavior a couple of years ago:
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9756
Ah, interesting. Some of the links in that bug indicate that people are
in fact depending on this behavior
-Boris
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 5:36 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
> On 2/21/12 7:35 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, 25 Sep 2011, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Not doing that last is actually a requirement for web compat, last I
>>> looked at this.
>>
>>
>> Do you have any links to pages that break if
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 6:35 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
> > (It also explicitly says that if implicit submit is supported but
> there's no submit button in the form, the implicit submit must still
> > happen. That doesn't sound like it could be followed, since lots of
> > pages are probably dependi
On 2/21/12 7:35 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
On Sun, 25 Sep 2011, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
Not doing that last is actually a requirement for web compat, last I
looked at this.
Do you have any links to pages that break if a form with more than one
text field supports implicit submission?
Not offhand.
On Sat, 24 Sep 2011, Kaustubh Atrawalkar wrote:
> On 24-Sep-2011, at 12:24 AM, Ian Hickson wrote:
>> On Fri, 23 Sep 2011, Kaustubh Atrawalkar wrote:
>>>
>>> If the form has submit button with display property as none, will that
>>> form should be implicitly submitted on pressing enter key? This
I propose that add a quality, bitrate, or filesize attribute to allow
the UA to decide between multiple streams by choosing the maximum quality file
that it can download within a reasonable amount of time (e.g. it will download
faster than it will play) or based on a user preference (e.g. prefe
Hi,
We just published a joint proposal for adding Encrypted Media to
HTMLMediaElement on the W3C website:
http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/html-media/raw-file/tip/encrypted-media/encrypted-media.html;
announcement:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2012Feb/0273.html. To avoid
forking the discus
On Tue, 13 Sep 2011, Michael Gratton wrote:
>
> HTML5 does not provide a means of submitting form content that is
> otherwise rendered as normal text, i.e. not as a form control. The use
> cases for this are the same as for the element, but when it is
> also desirable for the result of a calcu
Þann þri 21.feb 2012 19:41, skrifaði James Hawkins:
Is this use case not fully handled by the UA specifying the
appropriate action when building the intent, e.g., the user
right-clicks on an image in a page and the UA constructs context menu
items for edit/share/etc. action?
Not if the image is b
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 11:31 AM, Bjartur Thorlacius
wrote:
> Þann þri 21.feb 2012 18:44, skrifaði James Hawkins:
>
>> I'm not sure if the proposal was explicit enough, but for the RPH-esque
>> functionality in Web Intents, we activate WI in the same circumstances
>> RPH is activated, which is whe
Þann þri 21.feb 2012 18:44, skrifaði James Hawkins:
I'm not sure if the proposal was explicit enough, but for the RPH-esque
functionality in Web Intents, we activate WI in the same circumstances
RPH is activated, which is when links are activated in a page. Can you
elucidate how the scenarios yo
Thanks for your feedback, Bjartur.
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 9:30 AM, Bjartur Thorlacius wrote:
> Þann mið 15.feb 2012 23:39, skrifaði James Hawkins:
>
> * If |scheme| is specified, |action| *should* (must?) be ignored.
>>
> Why would you forbid distinguishing between actions on URIs? Postal and
Þann mið 15.feb 2012 23:39, skrifaði James Hawkins:
* If |scheme| is specified, |action| *should* (must?) be ignored.
Why would you forbid distinguishing between actions on URIs? Postal and
retrieval of mail, for example, are quite distinct actions. As are
modification and retrieval of documen
Awesome, thanks!
/ Jonas
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 5:18 AM, Adam Barth wrote:
> I've updated http://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/Crypto to have
> getRandomValues return the array.
>
> Adam
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 2:51 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> For reference, much of this feedback ha
16 matches
Mail list logo
