2012-02-22 20:38, Cameron Jones wrote:
I'm referring to the "for" attribute on which ties its value
to the elements which went into the calculation. This would otherwise
have to be done using event attributes.
I don't see how that is supposed to simplify things. It's supposed to
designate de
Personally as a web developer this a feature of forms that I've missed when
I'm building my REST apis and then have to put in some kind of hidden input
for method overwrite.
I know of other developers that also agree that this is a wanted feature.
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 5:38 PM, Adam Barth wrot
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 6:26 PM, Jukka K. Korpela wrote:
> 2012-02-22 20:13, Cameron Jones wrote:
>
>> It [the element]
>
>> does provide a greater degree of integration with the browser though.
>
> Is this a requirement, or just assumed features of implementation? Which of
> the assumed benefits
2012-02-22 20:13, Cameron Jones wrote:
It [the element]
> does provide a greater degree of integration with the browser though.
Is this a requirement, or just assumed features of implementation? Which
of the assumed benefits could not be achieved by adding a new value for
the type attribute
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 6:01 PM, Jukka K. Korpela wrote:
> 2012-02-22 19:30, Cameron Jones wrote:
>
>> Updating as form submittable element is included in a
>> proposal to enhance http request processing under a w3c issue
>
>
> This sounds like a pointless attempt at enhancing a pointless element
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 5:38 PM, Adam Barth wrote:
> Last time I asked around, there didn't seem to be much demand for
> these features so I didn't implement the previous version that was in
> the HTML spec.
>
> Adam
>
>
I've responded to repeated requests on public-html and
public-html-comments
2012-02-22 19:30, Cameron Jones wrote:
Updating as form submittable element is included in a
proposal to enhance http request processing under a w3c issue
This sounds like a pointless attempt at enhancing a pointless element.
Instead of , authors can use, and have been able to use since
rat
Last time I asked around, there didn't seem to be much demand for
these features so I didn't implement the previous version that was in
the HTML spec.
Adam
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 9:33 AM, Cameron Jones wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've submitted a proposal to w3c issue 195 which stems from requests
> to p
Hi,
I've submitted a proposal to w3c issue 195 which stems from requests
to provide support for additional HTTP methods on forms with specific
reference to clients without scripting support. The proposal is based
on extending the functionality of forms by exposing the abilities of
XHR to declarati
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 10:48 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Sep 2011, Michael Gratton wrote:
>>
>> HTML5 does not provide a means of submitting form content that is
>> otherwise rendered as normal text, i.e. not as a form control. The use
>> cases for this are the same as for the element, b
> From an author's point of view, there's no such thing as the
> document's original URI and, unless you're a nerd, you've never heard
> of the base URI. There's just the document's URI, modified by
> pushState.
>
> From this point of view, I'd say it's less surprising that relative
> URIs would b
11 matches
Mail list logo
