On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 12:52 PM, Glenn Maynard wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 11:36 PM, Kinuko Yasuda wrote:
>
>> A follow up about this proposal:
>>
>> Based on the feedbacks we got on this list we've implemented the
>> following API to do experiments in Chrome:
>> DataTransferItem.getAsEntry(
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 11:36 PM, Kinuko Yasuda wrote:
> A follow up about this proposal:
>
> Based on the feedbacks we got on this list we've implemented the following
> API to do experiments in Chrome:
> DataTransferItem.getAsEntry(in EntryCallback callback)
>
Does this actually need to be asy
On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 12:32 AM, Eric U wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 9:36 PM, Kinuko Yasuda wrote:
> > A follow up about this proposal:
> >
> > Based on the feedbacks we got on this list we've implemented the
> following
> > API to do experiments in Chrome:
> > DataTransferItem.getAsEntry(in
My sense is that's an acceptable risk given that this information commonly
leaks in document.referrer anyway. Using sandbox sounds like a worthwhile
backstop though.
Adam
> Tab suggests (on IRC) that this should just be tied to sandbox="", which
> seems reasonable at first blush.
Sandbox is opt-in (which means we'd start revealing origins in
existing settings without a warning); and has other serious
constraints which preclude it from some existing use cases (e.g.,
On 30.3.2012 17:41, Tim Streater wrote:
On 30 Mar 2012 at 16:05, Jukka K. Korpela wrote:
2012-03-30 17:22, Henri Sivonen wrote:
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 5:08 PM, Matthew Nuzum wrote:
For example, maybe a site can't afford translation but a small library
could be included that formats dat
On Wed, 4 Apr 2012, Michal Zalewski wrote:
>
> In fact, in the vein of opt-in disclosure perhaps something like
> discloselocation={none|origin|full} would be more convenient - in which
> case, you get something like
> window.parentLocations[n].{origin|href|hash|...}
>
> I constantly fear that
On Thu, 5 Apr 2012, Philip Jägenstedt wrote:
> On Wed, 04 Apr 2012 20:56:03 +0200, Ian Hickson wrote:
> > On Wed, 4 Apr 2012, Philip Jägenstedt wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > In current Opera and Firefox the timeline is always normalized
> > > > > to start at 0, so the time that corresponds to 0 in t
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 9:36 PM, Kinuko Yasuda wrote:
> A follow up about this proposal:
>
> Based on the feedbacks we got on this list we've implemented the following
> API to do experiments in Chrome:
> DataTransferItem.getAsEntry(in EntryCallback callback)
>
> which takes a callback that return
On Wed, 04 Apr 2012 01:14:43 +0200, Ian Hickson wrote:
If this works, then I'll use this for .
Thanks for figuring this out. I was kind of hoping this would end up in a
CSS draft, but Fullscreen works for now I guess.
http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/fullscreen/raw-file/tip/Overview.html
Looking for
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 3:58 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> I can see how it makes sense in the abstract. Browsers moved away from
> application-global modal dialogs to tab modal dialogs. I could see Twitter
> still wanting to you let you switch to @Connect or #Discover or search,
> while a modal
On 5/04/12 2:53 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
On Thu, 5 Apr 2012, Sean Hogan wrote:
So the ::backdrop could be styled to not cover the whole page?
Could it default to a "top" layer, but optionally be given a z-index?
The ::backdrop specifically would just be immediately below its element in
the "top l
Am 05.04.2012 03:59 schrieb Ojan Vafai:
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 6:52 PM, Ojan Vafai wrote:
1. We should add iframe[seamless] { display:block; }.
http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#embedded-content-2 already
expects iframe:not([seamless]) { border: 2px inset; }. In 90% percent o
On Wed, 04 Apr 2012 20:56:03 +0200, Ian Hickson wrote:
On Wed, 4 Apr 2012, Philip Jägenstedt wrote:
> >
> > In current Opera and Firefox the timeline is always normalized to
> > start at 0, so the time that corresponds to 0 in the original
> > timeline would be at a negative currentTime.
>
> I
On Thu, 05 Apr 2012 06:53:08 +0200, Ian Hickson wrote:
Those sound like non-modal dialogs. Do you have any examples of modal
dialogs on the Web that have these behaviours? As above, screenshots and
URLs to such examples would be really helpful.
I can see how it makes sense in the abstract. Bro
15 matches
Mail list logo
