On Jun 15, 2012, at 7:10 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
> On Tue, 29 May 2012, Ashley Gullen wrote:
>>
>> Has toDataURL() (from canvas) been considered for ordinary image and
>> video elements? Seems like it would be useful for pure javascript
>> applications. Currently it can be done by creating a n
On Tue, 29 May 2012, Ashley Gullen wrote:
>
> Has toDataURL() (from canvas) been considered for ordinary image and
> video elements? Seems like it would be useful for pure javascript
> applications. Currently it can be done by creating a new canvas, getting
> a 2D context, drawImage(), then ca
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Ian Melven wrote:
> in https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=341604#c180, David-Sarah
> Hopwood
> makes a few points about cookies in sandboxed documents :
>
> "Ugh, that's mandating an information leak about whether the document has
> cookies. Maybe a min
Hi,
in https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=341604#c180, David-Sarah Hopwood
makes a few points about cookies in sandboxed documents :
"Ugh, that's mandating an information leak about whether the document has
cookies. Maybe a minor leak,
but I don't understand why it should exist: if al
On Mon, 28 May 2012, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
>
> We encountered an app that uses "canplaythrough" on a video element to
> trigger execution of the app "so we don't start playing the video until
> we can do so without stuttering". http://gaiamobile.org/apps/cubevid/
> This approach works fine on
On Fri, 25 May 2012, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
>
> The list is at
> http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/scripting-1.html#support-the-scripting-language
>
> or
> http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/the-script-element.html#scriptingLanguages
> depending on which you prefer to read.
>
On Sun, 13 May 2012, Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis wrote:
> On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 1:47 AM, Brett Zamir wrote:
> > With Server-Side JavaScript taking off, could we reserve "runat" (or
> > maybe an even simpler and more concise "server" boolean attribute) for
> > a standard and (via CommonJS) potentiall
On Fri, 15 Jun 2012, Simon Pieters wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Jun 2012 20:32:16 +0200, Ian Hickson wrote:
> > On Thu, 14 Jun 2012, Simon Pieters wrote:
> > >
> > > It's not more. But it still is. Even though images aren't required
> > > to load at all, you still recently changed the way they load to be
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 1:46 AM, Ian Hickson wrote:
> When a document is aborted the state is more or less left exactly as it
> was when it was aborted. This includes the readiness state. It also means
> no events fire (e.g. no 'load', 'unload', or 'error' events), a number of
> scripts just get a
On Thu, 14 Jun 2012 20:32:16 +0200, Ian Hickson wrote:
On Thu, 14 Jun 2012, Simon Pieters wrote:
It's not more. But it still is. Even though images aren't required to
load at all, you still recently changed the way they load to be
compatible (http://html5.org/r/7128 ). We should also specify
10 matches
Mail list logo
