On Thu, 13 Sep 2012 23:58:42 +0200, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
However, both exposing the hiearchy and flattening it have all kinds of
risks. It's possible for the user to accidentally expose his entire
computer's hard drive without realising it. On some systems (including at
least modern
Just saw the following change: http://html5.org/r/7347, and while it's
certainly nice to have examples, I don't understand why rel=tag
*always* applies to the whole document. I think it makes perfect sense
in the first example, but my expectation as an author would be for
tags within articles to
Le 14/09/2012 09:50, Markus Ernst a écrit :
Am 13.09.2012 23:06 schrieb Ojan Vafai:
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 1:07 PM, Alain Couthures
alain.couthu...@agencexml.com wrote:
Le 07/09/2012 12:32, Mikko Rantalainen a écrit :
2012-09-07 11:57 Europe/Helsinki: Hugh Guiney:
JavaScript into, say, a
On Fri, 14 Sep 2012, Hugh Guiney wrote:
Just saw the following change: http://html5.org/r/7347, and while it's
certainly nice to have examples, I don't understand why rel=tag
*always* applies to the whole document.
Because it was invented before article, so consumers apply it to the
whole
Didn't mean to go off-list with this. Posting the prior exchange
before I respond:
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 7:36 PM, Hugh Guiney hugh.gui...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
Because it was invented before article, so consumers apply it to the
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 9:51 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
Also, as I pointed out in the original post, consumers already use
rel=tag intending for it to apply only to portions of a page.
Consumers or producers? What matters here is not changing _consumer_
behaviour, so that we don't
