Am 11.10.2012 18:36 schrieb Ian Hickson:
On Thu, 11 Oct 2012, Markus Ernst wrote:
IMHO as an author, the "bandwidth" use case is not solved in a future
proof manner
It's not solved at all. I didn't attempt to solve it. Before we can solve
it, we need to figure out how to do so, as discussed h
On Oct 11, 2012, at 1:10 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Oct 2012, Mathew Marquis wrote:
>> On Oct 11, 2012, at 12:36 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
>>> On Thu, 11 Oct 2012, Markus Ernst wrote:
IMHO as an author, the "bandwidth" use case is not solved in a future
proof manner
>>>
>
On Thu, 11 Oct 2012, Mathew Marquis wrote:
> On Oct 11, 2012, at 12:36 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
> > On Thu, 11 Oct 2012, Markus Ernst wrote:
> >>
> >> IMHO as an author, the "bandwidth" use case is not solved in a future
> >> proof manner
> >
> > It's not solved at all. I didn't attempt to solve
On Oct 11, 2012, at 12:36 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Oct 2012, Markus Ernst wrote:
>>
>> IMHO as an author, the "bandwidth" use case is not solved in a future
>> proof manner
>
> It's not solved at all. I didn't attempt to solve it. Before we can solve
> it, we need to figure out how
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 11:36 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 6:09 AM, Anne van Kesteren
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 7:28 PM, Joshua Bell
> wrote:
> >> Practically speaking, this would mean refactoring the combined spec so
> that
> >> the current BOM handling is d
On Thu, 11 Oct 2012, Markus Ernst wrote:
>
> IMHO as an author, the "bandwidth" use case is not solved in a future
> proof manner
It's not solved at all. I didn't attempt to solve it. Before we can solve
it, we need to figure out how to do so, as discussed here (search for
"bandwidth one"):
On Thu, 11 Oct 2012, Mark Callow wrote:
> On 2012/10/10 12:29, Ian Hickson wrote:
> > On Wed, 10 Oct 2012, Mark Callow wrote:
> >> I don't know what the browser on the SH-10D is doing, (It's running
> >> Android 4.0) but, given the physical size (4.5"), if they were making
> >> the css pixels sma
Am 10.10.2012 20:36 schrieb Ian Hickson:
On Wed, 10 Oct 2012, Tim Kadlec wrote:
That's actually exactly why it's better _not_ to plan for it. We can't
design features for problems we don't understand. It's better to wait
until we have real problems before fixing them.
You may not be able to p
