Stewart Brodie schrieb am Fri, 14 Dec 2012
14:33:43 +:
> Steve Faulkner wrote:
>
> > Stewart wrote:
> >
> > It doesn't necessarily. I've come across pages that expect the
> > head to be displayed too. e.g. tests at
> > http://meyerweb.com/eric/css/tests/css3/like
> > http://meyerweb.com/
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 12:19 AM, Nils Dagsson Moskopp <
n...@dieweltistgarnichtso.net> wrote:
> "Bruce Lawson" schrieb am Sat, 26 Jan 2013 13:30:18
> -:
>
> > In short, why should the spec suggest any specific method of marking
> > up comments?
>
> As someone who is interested in semantics a
I'll actually follow up my last post with this.
Is there any scenario where something can be done with these changes, or
any one of them, that today isn't possible with the current specifications?
I simply don't see one myself. If you could give a scenario, then could you
possibly make an example
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 8:43 AM, Glenn Maynard wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Robert O'Callahan
> wrote:
>
> Even if you get past that, you still have the problem that revoked URLs
>> are useless. It's impossible to do something equivalent to video2.src =
>> video1.src (which works to
On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 1:37 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 2:43 AM, Robert O'Callahan
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 10:50 PM, Jonas Sicking
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Also, for what it's worth, I'm holding out hope that we can change
> >> createObjectURL to be autorevoking b
Usecase 1: This can already be covered by having the bot/engine look for an
irc protocol link on the page.
Usecase 2 part one: Operating systems already do this. They see an irc://
protocol and ask what to open it with or use their already assigned option.
No need for a browser to take this over.
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 8:39 AM, L. David Baron wrote:
> But I think it's a large amount of extra implementation complexity
> to honor @-rules whose purpose is to build global dictionaries (in
> particular, @keyframes and @font-face), and I suspect the end result
> of honoring them would yield te
Ralph Giles schrieb am Tue, 11 Dec 2012 17:23:38
-0800:
> On 12-12-11 4:58 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
>
> […]
>
> > I don't think we should have an open-ended API without fixed names,
> > because that is a recipe for an interoperability disaster.
>
> I agree it would have interoperability issues.
Adrian Testa-Avila schrieb am Sun, 27 Jan
2013 10:31:06 -0800:
> So, maybe a better question is why should the spec suggest only one
> specific method?
Answer: As someone consuming HTML and XML content, I find it extremely
unhelpful if equivalent semantics are expressed in mand different ways.
"Bruce Lawson" schrieb am Sat, 26 Jan 2013 13:30:18
-:
> In short, why should the spec suggest any specific method of marking
> up comments?
As someone who is interested in semantics and tired of scraping
content and applying scrappy heuristics: If it is clear that an
within an represents
Gryllida schrieb am Fri, 1 Feb 2013 15:41:50 +1030:
> […]
>
> It is rather common to have a channel for a website, not just one
> page. There are some exceptions of sites which have subsites with a
> channel for each. A {IRC, XMPP} channel is "an official chat medium
> aiming to serve as an offic
11 matches
Mail list logo
