Re: [whatwg] Provide a system to observe nodes entering and leaving the viewport

On 6/23/13 3:37 PM, louis-rémi Babé wrote: Hi, I've opened a bug about a ViewportObserver API that would allow developers to receive a digest of what nodes enter or leave the viewport (similar to MutationObserver). The bug is on the w3's bugzilla:

Re: [whatwg] Should a figure element require a reference? (was: use cases for figure without figcaption?)

Hi Xaxio On 21 June 2013 15:59, Xaxio Brandish xaxiobrand...@gmail.com wrote: Steve, Please permit me to change the subject line since the topic no longer answers the subject question? thanks! The next sentence in the WHATWG spec [1] states The element can thus be used to annotate

Re: [whatwg] Cross-Origin Cookies Sharing Proposal

Hi Mountie, I think they are different experiences. we want a smooth solution. Regards, Charlie 2013/6/24 Mountie Lee moun...@paygate.net for SSO, did you tried SAML or OAuth? On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 12:00 PM, Huan Du dh20...@gmail.com wrote: Nils, Thanks for your feedback. There

Re: [whatwg] Questions regarding Path object

On Jun 17, 2013, at 17:55 , Rik Cabanier caban...@gmail.com wrote: I think we need to get some browser vendors on board. What's the process to do so? However, I believe Firefox has been working on landing 'path' and there was a patch for WebKit that also landed a partial path object. I'm

Re: [whatwg] Questions regarding Path object

On Jun 24, 2013, at 8:38 AM, Jürg Lehni li...@scratchdisk.com wrote: On Jun 17, 2013, at 17:55 , Rik Cabanier caban...@gmail.com wrote: I think we need to get some browser vendors on board. What's the process to do so? However, I believe Firefox has been working on landing 'path' and

Re: [whatwg] Should a figure element require a reference? (was: use cases for figure without figcaption?)

Good morning Steve, (had to snip the message and resend, it went over the mailing list size limit) On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 2:17 AM, Steve Faulkner faulkner.st...@gmail.comwrote: OK so 'typically' infers that figure is used in this way, from a recent review of data (June 2013 data set from

Re: [whatwg] Challenging canvas.supportsContext

2013/6/21 Benoit Jacob jacob.benoi...@gmail.com Any other application use cases? Anyone? I believe that if no unquestionable application use case can be given, then this function should be removed from the spec. Benoit

Re: [whatwg] Challenging canvas.supportsContext

On 25/06/2013, at 5:56 AM, Benoit Jacob jacob.benoi...@gmail.com wrote: 2013/6/21 Benoit Jacob jacob.benoi...@gmail.com Any other application use cases? Anyone? I believe that if no unquestionable application use case can be given, then this function should be removed from the spec.

Re: [whatwg] Questions regarding Path object

Well I know there will be problems: Paper.js has a Path class since 2011, and these will clash when using the library without scoping, which is what many people do. I was hoping that a more specific name could be adopted before the standard is set in stone, hence the proposal of adding 2D to

Re: [whatwg] Cross-Origin Cookies Sharing Proposal

Sure, it is an implementation issue, but I think the standardization should let it be easy. Like the tags header, footer... why we need them? right? Regards Charlie 在 2013-6-25，8:49，Mountie Lee moun...@paygate.net I think it is about not for standardization issue but for implementation