On 11/16/13 3:24 PM, "matmarquis.com" wrote:
>
>I started and have been running the Responsive Images Community Group for
>nearly three years now.I helped build BostonGlobe.com and the original
>³prototype² script for responsive images, I¹m a maintainer on the
>Picturefill project, and I wrote la
On Nov 16, at 4:25 PM, Bruno Racineux wrote:
>
>
> On 11/15/13 9:48 PM, "matmarquis.com" wrote:
>
>> I©öd say the likelihood of a project not using a content image directory a
>> step or two from root is roughly the same as the likelihood that I©öm
>> hot-linking to images on someone else©ös
On 11/15/13 9:48 PM, "matmarquis.com" wrote:
>I¹d say the likelihood of a project not using a content image directory a
>step or two from root is roughly the same as the likelihood that I¹m
>hot-linking to images on someone else¹s website땧hich is to say ³very
>slim.² The ³real world with clouds
On Nov 16, 2013, at 11:30 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
> This entire discussion, for months, has been entirely about syntax. I
> don't think I've seen a single person talk about semantics, nor do I
> think it would make much sense to do so.
Maybe semantics is the wrong word. I feel (and others agr
On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 10:54 AM, Timothy Hatcher wrote:
> My objections were mostly about semantics and not purely aesthetic. I also
> wasn't the only one to raise concerns on webkit-dev. To represent the WebKit
> community concerns as “personal” is disingenuous. I don't pretend to
> represent
> On Nov 16, 2013, at 8:09 AM, "Tab Atkins Jr." wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 3:55 AM, Kornel Lesiński wrote:
>> Basically authors will hate us. We've been going in circles for a couple of
>> years now and all we have to offer is an incomplete solution? And browser
>> vendors can't even a
On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 3:55 AM, Kornel Lesiński wrote:
> Basically authors will hate us. We've been going in circles for a couple of
> years now and all we have to offer is an incomplete solution? And browser
> vendors can't even agree which one of the half-baked solutions is it going
> to be :(
On 8/27/13 12:26 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
The current mimesniff spec says that when the Apache workaround is
applied sniffing should still be able to detect the content as
PostScript, images, videos, archives, audio formats, etc.
I feel that this poses an unacceptable security risk due to allowi
On Sun, 10 Nov 2013 08:20:33 -, Adam Barth wrote:
This is similar to AppCache vs Alex's ServiceWorkers. AppCache
addresses a small set of use cases, probably not enough. ServiceWorkers
provides the
tools to address a lot of use cases, but isn't directly itself a
solution;
you use it t
On Saturday, November 16, 2013 12:11 AM, Bruno Racineux
> On 11/15/13 2:50 PM, "Tab Atkins Jr." wrote:
> > There is no compaction
> > scheme that helps here. (Unless you're trying for one of the
> > url-template ones, and we don't want to go there.)
>
> Why not? I'd like to hear the argument aga
10 matches
Mail list logo
