[whatwg] inverse property mechanism for Microdata?

2014-01-31 Thread Dan Brickley
Hi folks. I'm relaying this from the schema.org collaboration, probably the main user of HTML's Microdata mechanism. We'd (schema.org 'we') like to make a public proposal to update Microdata with a syntax for expressing inverse properties/relationships. FWIW other notations that schema.org

Re: [whatwg] Proposal: Locale Preferences API

2014-01-31 Thread Ian Hickson
On Thu, 12 Dec 2013, Jungshik Shin (신정식, 申政湜) wrote: 2013/11/27 Boris Zbarsky bzbar...@mit.edu On 11/27/13 4:28 PM, Jungshik Shin (신정식, 申政湜) wrote: That is, I suggest that 'navigator.language' always be the UI language of a web browser. That's an unacceptable privacy leak from

Re: [whatwg] inverse property mechanism for Microdata?

2014-01-31 Thread Ian Hickson
On Fri, 31 Jan 2014, Dan Brickley wrote: We'd (schema.org 'we') like to make a public proposal to update Microdata with a syntax for expressing inverse properties/relationships. [...] Here's an example with 'containedIn'. The idea is that we want to express that the LocalBusiness (i.e.

Re: [whatwg] Comments on dialog

2014-01-31 Thread Ian Hickson
On Wed, 18 Dec 2013, Brian Blakely wrote: On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 2:13 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote: On Wed, 18 Dec 2013, Brian Blakely wrote: On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 3:14 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote: I've added a rule to the spec that says that viewports have to be

[whatwg] IE10 inconsistency with Blob / createObjectURL

2014-01-31 Thread K. Gadd
Apologies if this has come up on the list before: IE10 appears to have shipped implementations of the Blob constructor along with createObjectURL. While they work, there appears to be a significant deviation from the spec behavior (at the very least, Firefox and Chrome implement these APIs as I'd