On Feb 3, 2014, at 11:23 AM, Ben Vinegar b...@benv.ca wrote:
Ultimately, seamless doesn’t affect Disqus, because it only applies to
iframes that share the same origin as the browsing context. Which is good,
because we don’t want to use the seamless attribute anyways – it would let
publishers
Hey folks. Long time listener, first time caller.
I'm hoping for more a little bit more control over iframes. We have
iframe sandbox which is pretty fantastic right now. I'd like to see some
possibilities in both directions (more and less strict).
More strict:
- Disallow modal dialogs (e.g.
This sounds like an interesting idea, but I think it would quite easily get
out of hand if people wanted some options from More Strict but not all of
them, there would probably need to be a finer control of permissions.
~ Shane Hudson
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 3:54 PM, Chris Coyier
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 2:11 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
The second does setTransform(0,0,0,0,0,0), which should reset the CTM
to a zero matrix (again, not invertible). IE, Opera and FF draw a
line to 0,0 and close the path afterwards (which kind of makes sense,
since the
On Thu, 6 Feb 2014, Justin Novosad wrote:
I am looking into correcting Chrome's behavior to make it spec-compliant in
this case. There is one specific primitive that is proving problematic:
arcTo
The problem is that the algorithm needs to bring the last point in the
subpath into the arc's
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Justin Novosad ju...@google.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 2:11 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
The second does setTransform(0,0,0,0,0,0), which should reset the
CTM
to a zero matrix (again, not invertible). IE, Opera and FF draw a
line to
