On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 4:24 PM, Robert O'Callahan wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 8:15 AM, Justin Novosad wrote:
>
>> Sorry for the confusion, the point I was trying to make was unrelated to
>> the CTM question (almost). My point is that the tesselation of a path is
>> something that can be cac
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 8:15 AM, Justin Novosad wrote:
> Sorry for the confusion, the point I was trying to make was unrelated to
> the CTM question (almost). My point is that the tesselation of a path is
> something that can be cached in a Path2D object.
>
> If you do this, you can take advantag
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 4:22 PM, Rik Cabanier wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 12:15 PM, Justin Novosad wrote:
>
>> Sorry for the confusion, the point I was trying to make was unrelated to
>> the CTM question (almost). My point is that the tessellation of a path is
>> something that can be
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 12:15 PM, Justin Novosad wrote:
> Sorry for the confusion, the point I was trying to make was unrelated to
> the CTM question (almost). My point is that the tessellation of a path is
> something that can be cached in a Path2D object.
>
Path2D does not contain the winding
Sorry for the confusion, the point I was trying to make was unrelated to
the CTM question (almost). My point is that the tesselation of a path is
something that can be cached in a Path2D object.
If you do this, you can take advantage of the cached tessellation:
(apply tranform 1 to ctx)
ctx.fill(p
On Mar 20, 2014, at 7:44 PM, Justin Novosad wrote:
> This would apply the CTM to the incoming path, correct? I am a little bit
> concerned that this API could end up being used in ways that would cancel
> some of the performance benefits (internal caching opportunities) of Path2D
> objects.
This would apply the CTM to the incoming path, correct? I am a little bit
concerned that this API could end up being used in ways that would cancel
some of the performance benefits (internal caching opportunities) of Path2D
objects.
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 1:49 PM, Dirk Schulze wrote:
> On Mar
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 1:52 PM, Justin Novosad wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> The recently added currentTransform attribute on CanvasRenderingContext2D
> gives shared access to the rendering context's transform. By "shared", I
> mean:
>
> a) this code modifies the CTM:
> var matrix = context.currentTra
I totally agree on Justin.
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 7:52 PM, Justin Novosad wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> The recently added currentTransform attribute on CanvasRenderingContext2D
> gives shared access to the rendering context's transform. By "shared", I
> mean:
>
> a) this code modifies the CTM:
> var
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 10:52 AM, Justin Novosad wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> The recently added currentTransform attribute on CanvasRenderingContext2D
> gives shared access to the rendering context's transform. By "shared", I
> mean:
>
> a) this code modifies the CTM:
> var matrix = context.currentTr
Hello all,
The recently added currentTransform attribute on CanvasRenderingContext2D
gives shared access to the rendering context's transform. By "shared", I
mean:
a) this code modifies the CTM:
var matrix = context.currentTransform;
matrix.a = 2;
b) In this code, the second line modifies matrix
On Mar 20, 2014, at 6:31 PM, Rik Cabanier wrote:
> addPath is currently defined on the Path2D object. [1]
> Is there a reason why it's not defined on CanvasPathMethods instead? That
> way this method is available on the 2d contest so you can append a path to
> the current graphics state.
>
> Thi
addPath is currently defined on the Path2D object. [1]
Is there a reason why it's not defined on CanvasPathMethods instead? That
way this method is available on the 2d contest so you can append a path to
the current graphics state.
This would also negate the need for setCurrentPath.
1:
http://www
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 2:41 PM, Rik Cabanier wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 2:30 PM, Justin Novosad wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 2:18 PM, Rik Cabanier wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 1:47 PM, Justin Novosad wrote:
>>>
>
>
>> I hav
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 11:23 AM, Rik Cabanier wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 7:01 AM, Justin Novosad wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 5:47 PM, Rik Cabanier wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Justin Novosad wrote:
>>>
I agree it should be optional,
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 7:01 AM, Justin Novosad wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 5:47 PM, Rik Cabanier wrote:
>
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Justin Novosad wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> I agree it should be optional, but just to play devil's advocate : you
>>> can
>>> create an identity SVG
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 5:47 PM, Rik Cabanier wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Justin Novosad wrote:
>>
>>
>> I agree it should be optional, but just to play devil's advocate : you can
>> create an identity SVGMatrix with a simpler bit of code. Just do this
>> right
>> after creating
17 matches
Mail list logo
