[whatwg] summary/details - proposal

2014-04-05 Thread Steve Faulkner
note: bringing this to the whatwg list to elicit feedback from implementers and other interested parties that are not involved in the discussion at the W3C Currently the implementation(s) of summary/details elements do not match the spec.

[whatwg] Canvas normalize rect() and strokeRect()

2014-04-05 Thread Dirk Schulze
Hi, I looked at the behavior of negative width or height for the rect() and strokeRect() functions. All browsers normalize the passed parameters for strokeRect() to have positive width and height. strokeRect(90,10,-80,80) — strokeRect(10,10,80,80) http://jsfiddle.net/za945/ Just WebKit

Re: [whatwg] Canvas normalize rect() and strokeRect()

2014-04-05 Thread Rik Cabanier
On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 9:01 AM, Dirk Schulze dschu...@adobe.com wrote: Hi, I looked at the behavior of negative width or height for the rect() and strokeRect() functions. All browsers normalize the passed parameters for strokeRect() to have positive width and height.

Re: [whatwg] summary/details - proposal

2014-04-05 Thread Ian Hickson
On Sat, 5 Apr 2014, Steve Faulkner wrote: The summary itself is not interactive, so only the triangle provides the actionable control. The spec doesn't disallow making clicks on (non-interactive) parts of the summary defer to the disclosure triangle. Browsers should just match platform