Re: [whatwg] Notifications: the ability to specify notifications behavior

2014-08-29 Thread bindar
Jonas Sicking wrote: > On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 9:18 AM, Robert Bindar > wrote:>> My thought is to firstly introduce a small package of behaviors that >> would include "lights", "vibration" and "disrupting" >> (and maybe "noclear" too). >> The default value for all these 3 behaviors is false.> I

Re: [whatwg] Notifications: the ability to specify notifications behavior

2014-08-29 Thread Jonas Sicking
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 9:18 AM, Robert Bindar wrote: > My thought is to firstly introduce a small package of behaviors that > would include "lights", "vibration" and "disrupting" > (and maybe "noclear" too). > The default value for all these 3 behaviors is false. I don't think we'll want to defa

Re: [whatwg] Notifications: the ability to specify notifications behavior

2014-08-29 Thread Robert Bindar
On 08/13/2014 04:36 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote: On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 2:12 PM, Robert Bindar wrote: Concerning web notifications, it would be very helpful for content and web apps to have a way of specifying the behavior their notifications should have. For instance, a chat client may not alway

Re: [whatwg] Preloading and deferred loading of scripts and other resources

2014-08-29 Thread bizzbyster
We need to bite the bullet and add a priority attribute and an expected-size attribute. Priority: The web server will often have information that allows it to know better than the UA about the priority of objects. Basing this on type is not super useful when we have only a few types and we ha