On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 4:28 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 2:21 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>> * We should consider the case of persistent notifications separate
>> from notifications that automatically close when a page goes away.
>
> Strawman: We classify existing notifica
On Sep 24, 2014 3:51 AM, "Silvia Pfeiffer"
wrote:
>
> On 24 Sep 2014 20:40, "James Graham" wrote:
> >
> > On 24/09/14 02:54, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> >
> > > In the meantime, I'd like to add a property to window.navigator to
> > > enable websites to get the same information from there as is already
On Sep 24, 2014 3:40 AM, "James Graham" wrote:
>
> On 24/09/14 02:54, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>
> > In the meantime, I'd like to add a property to window.navigator to
> > enable websites to get the same information from there as is already
> > available in the UA string. That would at least help with
Silvia Pfeiffer writes:
> On 24 Sep 2014 20:40, "James Graham" wrote:
>>
>> On 24/09/14 02:54, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>>
>> > In the meantime, I'd like to add a property to window.navigator to
>> > enable websites to get the same information from there as is already
>> > available in the UA string
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 2:21 AM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> * We should consider the case of persistent notifications separate
> from notifications that automatically close when a page goes away.
Strawman: We classify existing notifications as non-persistent
notifications. Only notifications associat
On 24 Sep 2014 20:40, "James Graham" wrote:
>
> On 24/09/14 02:54, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>
> > In the meantime, I'd like to add a property to window.navigator to
> > enable websites to get the same information from there as is already
> > available in the UA string. That would at least help with th
On 24/09/14 02:54, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> In the meantime, I'd like to add a property to window.navigator to
> enable websites to get the same information from there as is already
> available in the UA string. That would at least help with the parsing
> problem.
>
> And if means that we could mor
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 10:38 AM, Nils Dagsson Moskopp <
n...@dieweltistgarnichtso.net> wrote:
> Jonas Sicking writes:
>
> > In some cases websites uses the UA strings for bad reasons ("this is
> > how we've always done it"), in other cases because it's literally the
> > best way for them to crea
Jonas Sicking writes:
> In some cases websites uses the UA strings for bad reasons ("this is
> how we've always done it"), in other cases because it's literally the
> best way for them to create a good user experience for their users.
I have seen lots of the former and only some of the latter (s
