Re: [whatwg] An API for unhandled promise rejections

2015-05-19 Thread Jonas Sicking
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 2:07 PM, Domenic Denicola wrote: >> An API being proposed on a mailing list such as this one? > > The API is already proposed (see the rest of this thread). Ah, sorry, I misunderstood your earlier email to mean that you were intending to experiment with the API as well. /

Re: [whatwg] An API for unhandled promise rejections

2015-05-19 Thread Domenic Denicola
From: Jonas Sicking [mailto:jo...@sicking.cc] > An API being proposed on a mailing list such as this one? The API is already proposed (see the rest of this thread). The exact timing is tricky to figure out without a working implementation to play with, compare to real-world code, tweak, adjust,

Re: [whatwg] An API for unhandled promise rejections

2015-05-19 Thread Jonas Sicking
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 2:04 PM, Domenic Denicola wrote: > From: whatwg [mailto:whatwg-boun...@lists.whatwg.org] On Behalf Of Jonas > Sicking > >> That sounds hard to provide feedback on... > > What working mode would you prefer? An API being proposed on a mailing list such as this one? / Jonas

Re: [whatwg] An API for unhandled promise rejections

2015-05-19 Thread Elliott Sprehn
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 2:02 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote: > On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 1:57 PM, Domenic Denicola wrote: > >> It's hard to say what "this" you're talking about implementing in > Chrome in > >> terms of the task-queueing behavior. Is that something you just haven't > >> decided on yet? >

Re: [whatwg] An API for unhandled promise rejections

2015-05-19 Thread Domenic Denicola
From: whatwg [mailto:whatwg-boun...@lists.whatwg.org] On Behalf Of Jonas Sicking > That sounds hard to provide feedback on... What working mode would you prefer?

Re: [whatwg] An API for unhandled promise rejections

2015-05-19 Thread Jonas Sicking
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 1:57 PM, Domenic Denicola wrote: >> It's hard to say what "this" you're talking about implementing in Chrome in >> terms of the task-queueing behavior. Is that something you just haven't >> decided on yet? > > Yeah, I think this will be something that gets nailed down more

Re: [whatwg] An API for unhandled promise rejections

2015-05-19 Thread Domenic Denicola
From: Boris Zbarsky [mailto:bzbar...@mit.edu] > We (Mozilla) support having something here. Great! Thanks for your reply. And sorry for the lack of the specifics. We'll work on nailing something down (spec-wise) as we implement, and of course far ahead of any shipping. I'll reply when I get a r

Re: [whatwg] An API for unhandled promise rejections

2015-05-19 Thread Boris Zbarsky
On 5/18/15 6:49 PM, Domenic Denicola wrote: Ping. We're considering implementing this in Chrome and it would be helpful to get a sense if other vendors support this. We (Mozilla) support having something here. Not making the error event even more complicated than it already is makes sense.

[whatwg] Announcing the Media Session Standard

2015-05-19 Thread Philip Jägenstedt
Hi all, https://mediasession.spec.whatwg.org/ has been live since April 30, and we'd like to let everyone know of its existence. I recommend reading the introduction and https://github.com/whatwg/mediasession/blob/master/README.md for an overview of what we're trying to enable. We're doing a litt