Re: [whatwg] Document with a single input[type=radio]?

2016-04-07 Thread Smylers
> (A streaming browser will may hit this case after parsing the first > radio button element in the document. Then what?) Then browsers will follow the parsing algorithms and treat it accordingly. For backwards compatibility and interoperability, the spec covers how to handle all sorts of invalid i

Re: [whatwg] Icon mask and theme color

2015-06-17 Thread Smylers
in their mask image. Again, consider Twitter: if they have an icon which already is a solid shape of the correct colour (so it can be used as a colour icon, too), why should they have to specify that colour a second time in their HTML? You already know what the colour is, from the icon itself. Smylers

Re: [whatwg] A mask= advisory flag for link rel=icon

2015-06-17 Thread Smylers
’. Smylers -- http://twitter.com/Smylers2

Re: [whatwg] alternate ids for elements

2014-12-03 Thread Smylers
anchors and replaces them with their canonical spelling. Smylers -- http://twitter.com/Smylers2

Re: [whatwg] Dirty Property (Was: Markup-related feedback)

2014-10-28 Thread Smylers
is, on balance, worth including, merely answering the questions you asked.) Smylers -- http://twitter.com/Smylers2

Re: [whatwg] Preloading and deferred loading of scripts and other resources

2014-08-26 Thread Smylers
=... load-policy=when-needed precache img src=photo5.jpg alt=... load-policy=when-needed precache As they come into view, they'll become needed automatically. When they are not needed, they get precached if that wouldn't get in the way of other things getting loaded. Thanks. Smylers -- http

Re: [whatwg] input type=number for year input

2014-03-11 Thread Smylers
Ryosuke Niwa writes: On Mar 7, 2014, at 3:54 AM, Smylers smyl...@stripey.com wrote: An international website wanting a [year] ... could internally store all years using one particular system (say the Gregorian one), but allow input in other systems. This could be with a free-form text

Re: [whatwg] input type=number for year input

2014-03-11 Thread Smylers
Ryosuke Niwa writes: On Mar 11, 2014, at 2:28 AM, Smylers smyl...@stripey.com wrote: Ryosuke Niwa writes: On Mar 7, 2014, at 3:54 AM, Smylers smyl...@stripey.com wrote: Are there many websites currently catering [for] Japanese years by offering such an interface? If so

Re: [whatwg] input type=number for year input

2014-03-07 Thread Smylers
Ryosuke Niwa writes [re-ordered]: On Feb 19, 2014, at 7:36 AM, Jukka K. Korpela jkorp...@cs.tut.fi wrote: 2014-02-19 11:10, Smylers wrote: Jukka K. Korpela writes: The point is that year numbers aren't really numbers in a normal sense, any more than car plate numbers

Re: [whatwg] input type=number for year input

2014-03-07 Thread Smylers
can't find it in the ‘Oxford English Dictionary’), but if it's appearance, interface, and behaviour are identical to that of input type=number, what is the point of distinguishing the two? Cheers Smylers -- http://twitter.com/Smylers2

Re: [whatwg] input type=number for year input

2014-02-19 Thread Smylers
. But there are still many situations where this is useful, because of the context, such as the range of possible years and the location. Smylers -- http://twitter.com/Smylers2

Re: [whatwg] input type=number for year input

2014-02-19 Thread Smylers
Jukka K. Korpela writes: 2014-02-19 11:10, Smylers wrote: Jukka K. Korpela writes: The point is that year numbers aren't really numbers in a normal sense, any more than car plate numbers, credit card numbers, product numbers, or social security numbers are. Surely they can

Re: [whatwg] Stroking algorithm in Canvas 2d

2013-10-11 Thread Smylers
that the answer isn't “To retain compatibility with a non-web technology which was invented before you were born.” Cheers Smylers -- Stop drug companies hiding negative research results. Sign the AllTrials petition to get all clinical research results published. Read more: http://www.alltrials.net

Re: [whatwg] use cases for figure without figcaption?

2013-06-20 Thread Smylers
further label. Or the content of a figure may intrinsically have a title embedded in it already, such that an additional caption would be superfluous. Smylers -- Stop drug companies hiding negative research results. Sign the AllTrials petition to get all clinical research results published. Read

Re: [whatwg] Proposal: Change HTML spec to allow any arbitrary value for the meta name attribute

2013-06-04 Thread Smylers
, then I'll know what it's for and I won't complain about it again: __ Then the validator could add a wiki entry for it. Cheers Smylers -- Stop drug companies hiding negative research results. Sign the AllTrials petition to get all clinical research results published. Read

Re: [whatwg] Proposal: Change HTML spec to allow any arbitrary value for the meta name attribute

2013-06-04 Thread Smylers
Robin Berjon writes: On 04/06/2013 11:08 , Smylers wrote: Michael[tm] Smith writes: we receive a lot of comments and bug reports from confused/ frustrated users who are trying to use values for meta@name that are not registered. Could you give some examples of the kinds

Re: [whatwg] Features for responsive Web design

2012-09-08 Thread Smylers
that it would also be hard for authors to do so. Cheers Smylers -- New series of TV puzzle show 'Only Connect' (some questions by me) Mondays at 20:30 on BBC4, or iPlayer: http://www.bbc.co.uk/onlyconnect

Re: [whatwg] alt= and the meta name=generator exception

2012-08-06 Thread Smylers
different which wouldn't nudge developers into writing software which produces such mark-up, end-users benefit. Smylers -- http://twitter.com/Smylers2

Re: [whatwg] A mechanism to improve form autofill

2012-07-26 Thread Smylers
membership, so could possibly be covered by a system such as this. But since OpenID is an open standard which anybody can use, and isn't tied into a particular organization, an autocomplete type specifically for OpenID URLs may be worthwhile. Cheers Smylers -- http://twitter.com/Smylers2

Re: [whatwg] A mechanism to improve form autofill

2012-07-26 Thread Smylers
for pattern and inputmode, it allows anybody doing something less predictable to still set those attributes explicitly. The complicated cases would be possible, but wouldn't force redundancy on the common cases. Cheers Smylers -- http://twitter.com/Smylers2

Re: [whatwg] A mechanism to improve form autofill

2012-07-26 Thread Smylers
Aryeh Gregor writes: On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 11:52 AM, Smylers smyl...@stripey.com wrote: Perhaps specifying certain autocomplete types could set defaults for pattern and inputmode? So for this example autocomplete=cc-num would, if pattern isn't specified, imply pattern=\d{16

Re: [whatwg] Allow author's data either in header and footer

2012-07-16 Thread Smylers
locations (header and footer). Indeed. the question will became a simple matter of taste and habit. It already is, with the spec as it is. Smylers -- http://twitter.com/Smylers2

[whatwg] Typo in web+ Description

2012-07-14 Thread Smylers
All web+ schemes should use UTF-8 encodings were relevant. -- http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/iana.html#web+-scheme-prefix I think that should be where. Smylers -- http://twitter.com/Smylers2

[whatwg] 'Applicable Specifications'' Relevance Authors

2012-04-11 Thread Smylers
-- in particular authors wondering if they can extend HTML. Currently 'HTML5 for Web Developers' has a link 'other applicable specifications' which doesn't go anywhere: http://developers.whatwg.org/elements.html Cheers Smylers

Re: [whatwg] The blockquote element spec vs common quoting practices

2012-02-11 Thread Smylers
(as you demonstrate above). Using cite like that isn't conforming, surely? Smylers

Re: [whatwg] Spec with Implementation Details Highlighted?

2012-01-10 Thread Smylers
Ian Hickson writes: On Sat, 7 Jan 2012, Smylers wrote: If it's something you'd find useful even in its incomplete state, I can add an alternative style sheet Yes, please. Roger. I've added an alternative style sheet set that has a rule for .impl sections for you. HTH. Thank you

Re: [whatwg] Spec with Implementation Details Highlighted?

2012-01-07 Thread Smylers
Ian Hickson writes: On Thu, 29 Dec 2011, Smylers wrote: Hi there. Is there still a version of the HTML5 spec with implementation-only parts highlighted? The annotations in the spec were incomplete -- they only covered the parts of the spec that are used to generate

Re: [whatwg] Handling of collapsed whitespace in contenteditable

2011-06-20 Thread Smylers
authors could opt in to the sane behaviour. And any author who complains about the nbsp;-s not being quite as they wanted could be pointed at the pre-wrap alternative. Smylers -- http://twitter.com/Smylers2

Re: [whatwg] [html5] r5562 - [] (0) Change how vendor extensions are marked up. Fixing http://www.w3.org/Bugs [...]

2010-09-29 Thread Smylers
a slightly bigger change than you intended to introduce. Smylers -- http://twitter.com/Smylers2

Re: [whatwg] time element feedback

2010-09-01 Thread Smylers
just wrote the date in text or used the time element, in order to know whether your browser has already localized the date for you. Which, in general, an author will have no way of knowing. Smylers -- http://twitter.com/Smylers2

[whatwg] 'Main Part of the Content' Idiom

2010-06-04 Thread Smylers
Please could this be added to the 'idioms' section, perhaps giving examples of when article or section might be appropriate as well as one in which the main content is simply that which isn't in header, aside, etc. Thanks. Smylers -- http://twitter.com/Smylers2

Re: [whatwg] RFC: input type=username

2010-05-06 Thread Smylers
not be a valid e-mail address. But if a user tries to submit something that isn't a syntactically correct e-mail address, then he must have mis-typed his username. Using type=email allows the browser to alert him to this, so he can fix it. Without that, he has to wait for server-side validation. Smylers

Re: [whatwg] api for fullscreen()

2010-02-03 Thread Smylers
and views it. 3 A user doesn't wish to display some content full-screen, so ignores any attempt by the site to become full-screen, and continues to view it normal size. I'm struggling to come up with a scenario in which your concerns apply. Please could you elaborate. Thanks. Smylers -- Watch

Re: [whatwg] api for fullscreen()

2010-02-03 Thread Smylers
-agents may display things however they want if so-configured, rather than just stating it for this particular narrow case. Smylers -- Watch fiendish TV quiz 'Only Connect' (some questions by me) Mondays at 20:30 on BBC4, or iPlayer: http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b00lskhg

Re: [whatwg] the cite element

2009-09-20 Thread Smylers
for users than if, say, span (or i or div or whatever) had been used instead? Smylers

Re: [whatwg] the cite element

2009-09-20 Thread Smylers
', 'The Dragon Book', 'The Red Book', or 'The White Album'. So cite should be used for them. But it doesn't follow that cite should be used for any other occurrences of those terms -- the people Smith and Thomas, or a book which just happens to be red. Smylers

Re: [whatwg] [html5] r3886 - [e] (0) highlight relevant part of example for consistency

2009-09-19 Thread Smylers
of those parts in the current context, rather than denoting them as being important? Smylers

Re: [whatwg] [html5] r3859 - [acgiowt] (2) Parser changes: dc, ds, dialog are now treated differently. [...]

2009-09-15 Thread Smylers
://www.whatwg.org/html5#the-dd-element I think the first class=part-of-speech should be on the i rather than the dd (matching the other instances). Smylers

Re: [whatwg] the cite element

2009-09-15 Thread Smylers
with other changes from HTML4). And if authors of such pages on discovering non-title uses of cite aren't valid then remove them, that's a win for users of non-CSS browsers. Smylers

Re: [whatwg] Fakepath revisited

2009-09-03 Thread Smylers
. (We've already tried the alternative, and it's worse.) Smylers

Re: [whatwg] Comments on the definition of a valid e-mail address

2009-08-24 Thread Smylers
slightly defeats the purpose of HTML 5 introducing input type=email). Smylers

Re: [whatwg] Comments on the definition of a valid e-mail address

2009-08-24 Thread Smylers
anywhere in the local part (even immediately after another . or before the @). That change would appear to cover the cases in your data, but others may have data which shows there are additional cases. Smylers

Re: [whatwg] Text areas with pattern attributes?

2009-08-24 Thread Smylers
is to have cases specifically _for_ it -- not adding everything for which there isn't a reason against. If textarea pattern=... wouldn't in practice be used by authors then there's no point in adding it. If it would be used then it should be trivial to show some places where it would be used. Smylers

Re: [whatwg] small element should allow nested elements

2009-08-15 Thread Smylers
see the a href=http://www.bbc.co.uk/terms/;standard BBC Tamp;Cs./a./small /p In that case the short amount of 'small print' is distinguished from the surrounding text. Visual users can see it as such; a speaking browser could read it out faster. Smylers

Re: [whatwg] the cite element

2009-08-13 Thread Smylers
definition (which gives weight to the idea that the HTML 5 definition is actually what at least some people intended in the first place, or have already been using it as). So tweaking the definition to be more useful seems better than inventing a new element with a better name. Smylers

Re: [whatwg] the cite element

2009-08-13 Thread Smylers
that to be rendered? The conventional presentation would be for John Adams simply to be rendered in exactly the same way as the surrounding text, with the reader being given no information at all that those words are in some way special. Smylers

Re: [whatwg] Spec comments, sections 3.1-4.7

2009-08-13 Thread Smylers
to the page (as in, making progress and seeing the indicator move involves submitting a form and displaying the next page in the sequence), but so far as I can see from the spec progress can be used in these situations; it isn't restricted to use on a single page where it is updated dynamically. Smylers

Re: [whatwg] the cite element

2009-08-13 Thread Smylers
wouldn't be a call for an element which sometimes indicates its contents should be displayed to the reader in a way which indicates they are the title of a work and sometimes indicates its a person's name. Smylers

Re: [whatwg] Reading spec without boxes

2009-08-06 Thread Smylers
that always fits. I hadn't yet submitted this because I first planned to try it in more browsers. In particular I'm concerned that the child selector isn't support in some IE versions. Hope that helps. Smylers

Re: [whatwg] [html5] r3429 - [e] (0) Add a section on establishing a connection.

2009-07-17 Thread Smylers
wha...@whatwg.org writes: + pThe Web Socket protocol is an independent TCP-based + protocol. It's only relationship to HTTP ... An apostrofly has crept in there. Smylers

Re: [whatwg] Week Strings

2009-07-14 Thread Smylers
Ian Hickson writes: On Fri, 19 Jun 2009, Smylers wrote: For input type=week elements the spec requires: The value attribute, if specified, must have a value that is a valid week string. -- http://www.whatwg.org/html5#week-state But the spec's HTML source contains

Re: [whatwg] Localised numbers

2009-07-01 Thread Smylers
back to the server. But surely a UA can pick any UI they want for this -- including a text box where the user types a comma, and a decimal point displays as a comma? Smylers

Re: [whatwg] Offline Conformance Checkers

2009-06-28 Thread Smylers
defined in this specification is allowed or not. -- http://www.whatwg.org/html5#other-pragma-directives Also, the above sentence isn't marked up as an implementation requirement. Smylers

Re: [whatwg] [html5] r3316 - [e] (0) A quick introduction to HTML.

2009-06-26 Thread Smylers
-introduction-to-html Generally will be seems to be a prediction that the spec doesn't need to make, and could be seen as a recommendation for authors to quote attributes even when they're unnecessary. Could we simply omit that (finishing the sentence at keyword)? Smylers

Re: [whatwg] [html5] r3323 - [] (0) Add rules for improving compat with XSLT 1.0. (bug 6776)

2009-06-26 Thread Smylers
:/p + + pIf the transformation program outputs an element in no namespace, + the processor must ... snip Should this text be marked up as an implementation requirement? Smylers

[whatwg] Offline Conformance Checkers

2009-06-26 Thread Smylers
unconstrained inputs, e.g. to prevent denial of service attacks, to guard against running out of memory, or to work around platform-specific limitations. -- http://www.whatwg.org/html5#conformance-requirements Smylers

[whatwg] hasFeature() When Only 1 Syntax is Supported

2009-06-20 Thread Smylers
://www.whatwg.org/html5#conformance-requirements Smylers

[whatwg] Week Strings

2009-06-19 Thread Smylers
both of them. Conversely if they aren't permitted then it should accept neither of them (and therefore have to implement a 'which day is January 1st' algorithm, which I'm guessing it currently doesn't). Smylers

Re: [whatwg] Week Strings

2009-06-19 Thread Smylers
Anne van Kesteren writes: On Fri, 19 Jun 2009 11:48:17 +0200, Smylers smyl...@stripey.com wrote: The spec doesn't appear to provide an algorithm for determining which day of the week a year begins on (however I am not a browser developer; possibly this is sufficiently straightforward

Re: [whatwg] Week Strings

2009-06-19 Thread 'Smylers'
' of a week-year with 53 weeks is 53; the 'week number of the last day' of a week-year with 52 weeks is 52. Those things all seem much more obvious to me than working out which day January 1st of a given year is. But as I said, I'm not a browser developer so perhaps it's fine. Smylers

Re: [whatwg] Dom as Audience Prereq

2009-06-19 Thread Smylers
-- for example the rules on when to use which of strong, mark, b or providing alt text for images. Smylers

Re: [whatwg] Week Strings

2009-06-19 Thread Smylers
week 0 Except that the spec has already defined that a year starts on week 1 before the above sentence. Smylers

Re: [whatwg] b Lede Example

2009-06-19 Thread 'Smylers'
ledes also have a journalistic house style which requires journalists to consistently have the lede be the first paragraph (or whatever). Smylers

[whatwg] Using em for Meta-Content

2009-06-18 Thread Smylers
). That suggests the small element, but that isn't quite right either: whether a section is normative is materially relevant to the content, not just a legal technicality.) Smylers

[whatwg] b Lede Example

2009-06-18 Thread Smylers
currently possible with CSS. But that it exists as a plausible choice for presenting an article demonstrates how much a matter of styling, rather than content, this area is. And a limit of CSS should be fixed in CSS, not HTML. (span class=lede can always be used as a work-around.) Smylers

[whatwg] Tool Implementor Audience

2009-06-18 Thread Smylers
, since he's never intended his tool to conform to it. Could we make it something like implementors of tools that emit HTML or parse Web content? Smylers

[whatwg] Dom as Audience Prereq

2009-06-18 Thread Smylers
). There may be parts which do require Dom knowledge, but as written it sounds like a prereq for understanding any part of the spec, and as such may unnecessarily put people off. Smylers

[whatwg] HTML 5 and HTML4

2009-06-18 Thread Smylers
have them matching? (I haven't searched to see if this also occurs elsewhere in the document.) Smylers

[whatwg] workers Highlighted

2009-06-18 Thread Smylers
#serializability-of-script-execution What's this about? Smylers

[whatwg] Plus Signs in Signed Integers

2009-06-18 Thread Smylers
, and Lynx all also seem to manage the aborting, but use a default of zero instead. Firefox parses the 2 out of H2SO4, seemingly using the first integer it can find in the attribute, so possibly isn't special-casing +. Smylers

Re: [whatwg] Removing the need for separate feeds

2009-05-22 Thread Smylers
categories of handcrafted pages to gain feeds for free. I've often encountered webpages which I wished had feeds but don't. It's possible that an algorithm such as this would encourage more pages to do so. Smylers

Re: [whatwg] [Fwd: Re: Helping people seaching for content filtered by license]

2009-05-15 Thread Smylers
the user is interested in when choosing to view the page. Magazines and the like have been using this convention for years, without any need to explicitly define what indicates licensing information, seemingly without any ambiguity or confusion. Smylers

Re: [whatwg] [Fwd: Re: Helping people seaching for content filtered by license]

2009-05-15 Thread Smylers
Eduard Pascual writes: On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 8:40 AM, Smylers smyl...@stripey.com wrote: Am Freitag, den 08.05.2009, 19:57 + schrieb Ian Hickson: * Tara runs a video sharing web site for people who want licensing information to be included with their videos

Re: [whatwg] Question on (new) header and hgroup

2009-05-08 Thread Smylers
jgra...@opera.com writes: Quoting Smylers smyl...@stripey.com : James Graham writes: hgroup affects the document structure, header does not. That explains _how_ they are different (as does the spec), but not _why_ it is like that. More specifically: * Are there significant

Re: [whatwg] code attributes

2009-04-30 Thread Smylers
was separately converting pairs of line-breaks into p tags and use of a monospaced typeface into code spans, and the two happened to co-incide -- possibly the robot's author never even considered it. Smylers

Re: [whatwg] time

2009-03-16 Thread Smylers
or localized) the browser shows in the page depends on which format the author used? Smylers

Re: [whatwg] time

2009-03-14 Thread Smylers
Andy Mabbett writes: In message 20090314083450.ga30...@stripey.com, Smylers smyl...@stripey.com writes This thread appears to be proving that dates are very complicated and that to get them right for the general case involves lots of subtleties, All true. which would be a reason

Re: [whatwg] time

2009-03-09 Thread Smylers
: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/infrastructure.html#valid-month-string Which has the constraint year 0. Smylers

Re: [whatwg] [html5] Rendering of interactive content

2009-02-11 Thread Smylers
that at some point I want to debug your website, or examine how you achieved a particular effect, and that making your span-s green will assist me in doing that. I don't think there's any way around this. We don't want a way round it. It's a feature that users are in ultimate control. Smylers

Re: [whatwg] [html5] Rendering of interactive content

2009-02-11 Thread Smylers
Aryeh Gregor writes: On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 8:36 AM, Smylers smyl...@stripey.com wrote: That is precisely an instance of an author setting a background colour without a foreground colour -- specifically the author set the background colour used on links without setting the foreground

Re: [whatwg] [html5] Rendering of interactive content

2009-02-11 Thread Smylers
Aryeh Gregor writes: On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 10:13 AM, Smylers smyl...@stripey.com wrote: Ah, I see. Thanks for explaining that. I'm interpreting it as for each bit of text that you cause the background colour to be set for, also specify its foreground colour (and _vice versa_

Re: [whatwg] Hyphenation

2009-02-10 Thread Smylers
then...) Suppose you are reflowing some text (perhaps because you are quoting it); words which were broken over lines in the original may want rejoining into a single word in your version (that is, the soft hyphen disappears); but hyphens (non-soft) between two words need to remain. Smylers

Re: [whatwg] [html5] Rendering of interactive content

2009-02-09 Thread Smylers
defaults. In both case, a downloadable stylesheet would be much appreciated. I think a downloadable style-sheet is inevitable! Smylers

Re: [whatwg] [html5] Rendering of interactive content

2009-02-08 Thread Smylers
particular target audience; why should the spec attempt to dissuade her from doing so? Smylers

Re: [whatwg] [html5] Rendering of interactive content

2009-02-08 Thread Smylers
Giovanni Campagna writes: 2009/2/8 Smylers smyl...@stripey.com Giovanni Campagna writes: data:text/html,stylelabel { position:fixed; top:-1em; border:1px solid black; } label input { -moz-appearance:none; -webkit-appearance:none; border:none; width:auto; } input[type=submit

Re: [whatwg] Deprecating small , b

2008-11-25 Thread Smylers
will 100% support it and continue to render it as it always has been, so the 'breakage' is no way visible; if the author chooses not to care about it then no harm is done. Smylers PS: Pentasis, please could you send mails that do at least one of attributing who you're quoting or include In-Reply

Re: [whatwg] Deprecating small , b ?

2008-11-24 Thread Smylers
Asbjørn Ulsberg writes: On Mon, 17 Nov 2008 15:26:22 +0100, Smylers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In printed material users are typically given no out-of-band information about the semantics of the typesetting. However, smaller things are less noticeable, and it's generally accepted

Re: [whatwg] Deprecating small , b ?

2008-11-24 Thread Smylers
Felix Miata writes: On 2008/11/24 16:19 (GMT) Smylers composed: So I still think small works for denoting that something is of smaller importance. I do too, but I don't believe less importance can be the only inference. One could simply want smaller text, without expecting

Re: [whatwg] Absent rev?

2008-11-19 Thread Smylers
to consider. If, say, rel=up is barely used but when it is used it's generally used correctly then it's benign, and not causing any harm. Significant rev misuse has been identified; its existence is confusing people into writing something they don't mean. Smylers

Re: [whatwg] Absent rev?

2008-11-19 Thread Smylers
ways in which hundreds of different elements could be distributed throughout a population such that each of them are used on more than 0.2% of pages yet the mean elements per page is 19. Smylers

Re: [whatwg] Absent rev?

2008-11-18 Thread Smylers
be done with rev= can be done with rel= with an opposite keyword, so this omission should be easy to handle. There are some cases where that is just not possible. Which? Smylers

Re: [whatwg] [rest-discuss] HTML5 and RESTful HTTP in browsers

2008-11-17 Thread Smylers
, and in the remote shell type wget then paste in the copied link. If the link explicitly has ?type=PDF in the URL, I get what I want; if the format is specified out of the URL then I've just downloaded the wrong thing. Smylers

Re: [whatwg] Deprecating small , b ?

2008-11-17 Thread Smylers
message? However, you can only notice this if the words have been distinguished in some way. With b, all user-agents can choose to convey to users that those words are special. Smylers

Re: [whatwg] [rest-discuss] HTML5 and RESTful HTTP in browsers

2008-11-17 Thread Smylers
versions of the report, and wished to link to both of them. That's tricky if they have the same URL. Possibly I could do it like you have with the wget command-line above, but that requires me knowing which browsers my audience use and the precise syntax for them. Smylers

Re: [whatwg] Deprecating small , b ?

2008-11-17 Thread Smylers
from the surrounding text. Whereas if small or b are used, all user-agents can do _something_ with them. So I completely agree with what you say. Smylers

Re: [whatwg] [rest-discuss] HTML5 and RESTful HTTP in browsers

2008-11-17 Thread Smylers
a difference between the HTML version and the PDF version of the same content (or at least what is supposed to be the same content) -- how would I link to them? Smylers

Re: [whatwg] Dealing with UI redress vulnerabilities inherent to the current web

2008-09-30 Thread Smylers
Elliotte Harold writes: Smylers wrote: That's a sometimes convenient feature for site developers, but there's nothing you can do with content loaded from two sites you can't do with content loaded from one. Here's some I can think of: * Many sites are funded by displaying

Re: [whatwg] Dealing with UI redress vulnerabilities inherent to the current web

2008-09-30 Thread Smylers
players are at a disadvantage (because they aren't big enough to warrant doing such things themselves, and they can't outsource things to a third party because we've blocked such services from working). Smylers

Re: [whatwg] Dealing with UI redress vulnerabilities inherent to the current web

2008-09-27 Thread Smylers
there from here, even over multiple years. The first browser to implement such a restriction would break so many sites that its users would all switch to a browser that kept the web working as it has till now. And, knowing that, why would website authors bother to make the first move? Smylers

Re: [whatwg] RDFa Features (was: RDFa Problem Statement)

2008-08-27 Thread Smylers
to forcing them to use URIs, surely? Smylers

  1   2   >