Re: [whatwg] Video codec requirements changed [ISSUE-7 video-codecs]

quire that instead and then reply to all the pending feedback on video codecs. http://www.whatwg.org/issues/#graphics-video-codec Thanks for letting us know. This message connects the email discussion to the issue tracker... http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/7 -- Dan Connolly

Re: [whatwg] Feedback on the ping="" attribute (ISSUE-1)

in the meeting... http://www.w3.org/html/wg/nov07 -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/

Re: [whatwg] Answering the question... (timing of table headers issue)

On Thu, 2007-08-23 at 12:14 -0700, John Foliot wrote: > Dan Connolly wrote: > > > > I sympathize with your frustration, but I ask that you remain patient. > > Dan, > > Thank you for your prompt response. While patience is indeed a virtue, my > (our?) patience is

Re: [whatwg] Answering the question... (timing of table headers issue)

. That's an essential part of quality design decision-making. I recommend teleconferences as a good way to get a feel for group priorities and schedule. For example, we talked about the timing of this table headers issue last week. http://www.w3.org/2007/08/16-html-wg-minutes#item05 -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/

Re: [whatwg] Web Forms 2.0 and the W3C Patent Policy

ach WG, such as the one for WAF that shows what Opera and others have agreed to. Web Application Formats Working Group Patent Policy Status http://www.w3.org/2004/01/pp-impl/38483/status -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E

[whatwg] call for participation: W3C HTML Working Group

g on HTML with you. p.s. I am copying [EMAIL PROTECTED]; note that if you reply all, you'll be greeted by the W3C archive approval anti-spam robots, unless you have already been through that ritual. http://www.w3.org/2002/09/aa/ -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/