Re: [whatwg] HTML6 Doctype

2010-08-29 Thread David John Burrowes
of it, itself. david On Saturday, August 28, 2010, David John Burrowes bain...@davidjohnburrowes.com wrote: Hello all, I wanted to chime in on this discussion. Let me say up front that clearly the w3c and the browser vendors all are on the same page as you, Ian. I'm not in the position

Re: [whatwg] HTML6 Doctype

2010-08-28 Thread David John Burrowes
Hello all, I wanted to chime in on this discussion. Let me say up front that clearly the w3c and the browser vendors all are on the same page as you, Ian. I'm not in the position to be challenging your collective wisdom! But, I share some of the same concerns (and more) as David Bruant, and

Re: [whatwg] Appcache feedback (various threads)

2010-08-13 Thread David John Burrowes
On 2010/8/13, at 上午6:42, Anne van Kesteren wrote: On Fri, 13 Aug 2010 15:02:01 +0200, Patrick Mueller pmue...@muellerware.org wrote: On 8/12/10 6:29 PM, Ian Hickson wrote: On Thu, 29 Jul 2010, Anne van Kesteren wrote: XML would be much too complex for what is needed. We could possibly

[whatwg] A couple questions about the Web Storage spec

2010-08-12 Thread David John Burrowes
Hello all, I have a couple questions about the storage spec (I'm reading the August 10th version at (http://dev.w3.org/html5/webstorage/)). (1) The spec says: The object's indices of the supported indexed properties are the numbers in the range zero to one less than the number of key/value