On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 3:16 AM, Glenn Maynard gl...@zewt.org wrote:
On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 12:34 PM, David Sheets kosmo...@gmail.com wrote:
I am writing a documentation generation tool for a programming
language with right arrows represented as - but would like to render
them
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 11:11 PM, Glenn Maynard gl...@zewt.org wrote:
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 9:02 AM, Glenn Maynard gl...@zewt.org wrote:
Copying ASCII isn't desirable. It should copy the Unicode string a → b.
After all, that's what gets copied if you had done spana → b/span in
the first
generation tool for a programming language
with right arrows represented as - but would like to render them as →.
On 13 February 2015 at 15:45, Boris Zbarsky bzbar...@mit.edu wrote:
On 2/13/15 10:15 AM, David Sheets wrote:
I suppose currently Chrome is preventing copying hidden content but
Firefox
for this question? Should I take it somewhere else?
Thanks,
David Sheets
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 1:08 PM, Nils Dagsson Moskopp
n...@dieweltistgarnichtso.net wrote:
David Sheets kosmo...@gmail.com writes:
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 12:18 PM, James M. Greene
james.m.gre...@gmail.com wrote:
In this case, you can use Unicode escape values by preceding them with a
slash
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 3:02 PM, Glenn Maynard gl...@zewt.org wrote:
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 5:45 AM, David Sheets kosmo...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I have a page with
a span class=rarrspan-gt;/span/span b
and style
.rarr span { overflow: hidden; height: 0; width: 0; display: inline
to get interoperable behavior (or even find where such behavior
might be specified).
Thanks,
David
[1]:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/10393462/placing-unicode-character-in-css-content-value
Sincerely,
James Greene
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 5:45 AM, David Sheets kosmo...@gmail.com
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 12:23 PM, Mathias Bynens mathi...@opera.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 1:18 PM, James M. Greene
james.m.gre...@gmail.com wrote:
In this case, you can use Unicode escape values by preceding them with a
slash:
OP’s question wasn’t about how to escape non-ASCII
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 9:18 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
This is Anne's spec, so I'll let him give more canonical answers, but:
On Mon, 24 Sep 2012, David Sheets wrote:
Your conforming WHATWG-URL syntax will have production rule alphabets
which are supersets of the alphabets
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 8:03 AM, Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nl wrote:
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 6:18 AM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
Not necessarily, but that's certainly possible. Personally I would
recommend that we not change the definition of what is conforming from the
current
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 2:13 PM, Glenn Maynard gl...@zewt.org wrote:
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 7:18 PM, David Sheets kosmo...@gmail.com wrote:
Always. The appropriate interface is (string * string?) list. Id est,
an association list of keys and nullable values (null is
key-without-value
? Will they be unrepresentable?
Thanks,
David Sheets
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 4:07 PM, Glenn Maynard gl...@zewt.org wrote:
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 12:30 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.comwrote:
I suggest just making it a map from String-[String]. You probably
want a little bit of magic - if the setter receives an array, replace
the current
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 5:23 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
On Mon, 24 Sep 2012, David Sheets wrote:
Is there an issue with defining WHATWG-URL syntax as a grammar extension
to the URI syntax in RFC3986?
In general, BNF isn't very useful for defining the parsing rules when you
also
14 matches
Mail list logo
