On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 4:06 PM, Glenn Maynard wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 1:21 AM, Tab Atkins Jr.
> wrote:
>
> > Hm, I wonder if image-interpolation on the should affect
> > this? It's defined to only have an effect when you scale the
> > element itself, but I think it probably makes sens
FWIW, in Fabric.js [1], everything is scoped under global `fabric` object.
`fabric.Path`, `fabric.Circle`, `fabric.Color`, etc. For any third-party
library in a cross-browser environment, this has been the only sane
strategy of avoiding conflicts and keeping things scalable.
We learned about "glob
AFAIK, only dashed lines in WebKit at the moment —
http://kangax.github.com/jstests/canvas-v5/
More things coming soon, such as Path —
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97333
Not sure about shims. I implemented some of the features (paths, ellipses,
dashed lines) in Fabric.js (http://fabric
I'd love to see something like this as well.
In my experience this takes more than 80 lines. In Fabric.js [1], for
example, `fabric.Path#render` has ~180 LOC chunk [2] dedicated to doing
exactly this — drawing translated-from-SVG path using a combination of
`lineTo`, `moveTo`, `bezierCurveTo`, etc
I would be in favor of this.
In my recent app — http://mustachified.com — I used `mozGetAsFile` to
retrieve file from canvas, append it to form data and send to an external
service via cross-domain request.
When mozGetAsFile was not available, I had to build blob manually from
canvas' data url. A
When removing [1] a long-loading script element from a document, browsers
seem to disagree on whether such removal should affect page rendering. A
simple test — http://kangax.github.com/jstests/blocking_script_removal_test/—
shows that Opera (9.x - 11) and IE (5.5 - 9) immediately continue
parsing
mplement
document.documentElement and
document.body.
On Sep 20, 2009, at 4: 00PM, Juriy Zaytsev wrote:
Surely better than abominable –
`document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0]` :)
I agree. Unfortunately that is the most popular method I've seen.
There
are better solutions, but they haven&
On Sep 20, 2009, at 5:20 PM, Joseph Pecoraro wrote:
On Sep 20, 2009, at 4: 24PM, Juriy Zaytsev wrote:
Speaking of `document.head`, I think Mootools does exactly that.
Good thinking. I took a look at some JavaScript Libraries /
Frameworks. Here are some quick counts of how many times I
On Sep 20, 2009, at 4:15 PM, Joseph Pecoraro wrote:
On Sep 20, 2009, at 3:57 PM, Michael A. Puls II wrote:
I think it'd be cool to have to complement document.documentElement
and document.body.
On Sep 20, 2009, at 4: 00PM, Juriy Zaytsev wrote:
Surely better than abomi
On Sep 20, 2009, at 3:57 PM, Michael A. Puls II wrote:
On Sun, 20 Sep 2009 14:22:38 -0400, Joseph Pecoraro > wrote:
Was there any discussion for including "document.head" in HTML5?
I think it'd be cool to have to complement document.documentElement
and document.body.
Surely better than
10 matches
Mail list logo
