Re: [whatwg] WebSocket support in HTML5

Hi Philipp, After all, more or less the only situation you'd want to use UDP Wrong. But then personally, I'd use UDP for server-generated events, and something other than a context-devoid, connection-less, session-hijackable, bollocks protocol as my middleware backbone; I am clearly 180 degrees

Re: [whatwg] Dealing with UI redress vulnerabilities inherent to the current web

Hi Maciej, Does OS X (or the iPhone for that matter) support Java 6 yet? And were all these security bug reports you keep seeing to do with Java in general, or the Apple version in particular? Would Strict Same Origin policy not be useful as an optional (perhaps default) configuration? Cheers

Re: [whatwg] WebSocket websocket-origin

Hear! Hear! - Original Message - From: Shannon [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Anne van Kesteren [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: WHATWG [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 12:59 PM Subject: Re: [whatwg] WebSocket websocket-origin Anne van Kesteren wrote: What is the reason for doing

Re: [whatwg] Simplified WebSockets

Hi Shannon, In the absence of Socket Policy Files, this is a good fallback position; the shorter the handshake, the better. Cheers Richard Maher - Original Message - From: Shannon [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: WHAT working group whatwg@lists.whatwg.org Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 4:04 PM

Re: [whatwg] WebSocket and proxies

Hi Shannon, Bummer :-( Please don't give up! Sorry if this is a really stupid question (my knowledge of proxy-servers is minimal) but what issues are involved here that have not been solved with a product such as Orbited? http://www.orbited.org/ Look, I've never used it but, if I understand it

Re: [whatwg] WebSocket support in HTML5

Hi David, - Original Message - From: ddailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Richard's Hotmail [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, September 21, 2008 10:33 PM Subject: Re: [whatwg] WebSocket support in HTML5 Hi Richard, My apologies for getting involved in a topic I confess

Re: [whatwg] WebSocket support in HTML5

PROTECTED] To: Richard's Hotmail [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, September 21, 2008 10:33 PM Subject: Re: [whatwg] WebSocket support in HTML5 Hi Richard, My apologies for getting involved in a topic I confess to knowing very little about (though I would like to be able to have

Re: [whatwg] Dealing with UI redress vulnerabilities inherent tothe current web

Hi Rob, You're saying Java's security model is adequate for what people want to do on the Web. I say that is unproven since people are not using Java on the Web. *Why* they are not using Java on the Web is irrelevant. I certainly don't know what's on every web-page out there, but when it

[whatwg] WebSocket support in HTML5

Hi, I've been told that this is the correct forum for lobbying/venting about html5 changes; I hope that this is correct? My particular beef is with the intended WebSocket support, and specifically the restrictive nature of its implementation. I respectfully, yet forcefully, suggest that the

Re: [whatwg] WebSocket support in HTML5

architecture and you are getting it hopelessly wrong :-( Cheers Richard Maher - Original Message - From: James Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Richard's Hotmail [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, September 21, 2008 8:46 PM Subject: Re: [whatwg] WebSocket support in HTML5