Re: [whatwg] Placeholder option for text input boxes

2008-10-03 Thread Russell Leggett
I've wrestled with this because its something that our designer has wanted to use all over the place for an application I'm working on. It turns out to be a usability nightmare if not used sparingly. When we used it, it was definitely in place of an actual label, and I think this would be true in

Re: [whatwg] A slightly different use-case for shared workers

2008-08-29 Thread Russell Leggett
I'm also a Pandora fan, and I actually thought of another use. In addition to popping out a separate player, Pandora also opens new tabs/windows to browse pages about artists/songs. These pages allow you to listen to samples, but listening to them does not pause the player. It would be pretty cool

Re: [whatwg] Joined blocks

2008-08-02 Thread Russell Leggett
be controlled by css - when to break between blocks etc., but there a semantic and structural aspect as well. -Russ On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 11:00 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 7:28 AM, Russell Leggett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For what it's worth, Shannon, I

Re: [whatwg] Joined blocks

2008-08-02 Thread Russell Leggett
Ignore my last statement. It was a draft I wrote before reading Ian's response. If he has something in mind to get the same thing accomplished without adding extra tags, all the better. On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 8:06 PM, Russell Leggett [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: I would be happy to have

Re: [whatwg] Joined blocks

2008-08-01 Thread Russell Leggett
For what it's worth, Shannon, I totally agree with you. Not only is this something I have been wanted for a long time, but I think it belongs in the html. It's one thing if you just want columns, which is being covered here: http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-multicol/. The CSS covers that nicely, but

Re: [whatwg] Application deployment

2008-07-31 Thread Russell Leggett
is wrong with it, except that a library should consist of books, but that concept was already broken long ago. Chris -- *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Russell Leggett *Sent:* Wednesday, July 30, 2008 4:25 PM *To:* Peter Kasting

Re: [whatwg] Application deployment

2008-07-30 Thread Russell Leggett
, Jul 29, 2008 at 5:10 PM, Russell Leggett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That is a performance killer. I don't think it is as much of a performance killer as you say it is. Correct me if I'm wrong, but the standard connection limit is two. The standard connection limit is 6, not 2, as of IE 8

Re: [whatwg] Proposal for a link attribute to replace a href

2008-07-30 Thread Russell Leggett
What about an alternative attribute like navigate instead of href. It would not carry the full weight of the anchor tag, but would handle the 90% use case. It would not allow for the same options as the a tag, and the a tag would continue to work the same way that it has been. On Wed, Jul 30,

Re: [whatwg] Application deployment

2008-07-29 Thread Russell Leggett
So if I load http://www.example.com/x.m21#y.htmlhttp://www.example.com/x.m21#y.html*q and (in the same document, or in another tab?) load http://www.example.com/z.html, and x.m21 contains a z.html but the server also responds to http://example.com/z.html, does the second load (z.html) come

Re: [whatwg] Application deployment

2008-07-29 Thread Russell Leggett
O'Callahan [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 5:59 AM, Russell Leggett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes, the one major hang up that I foresee is how a browser should handle asynchronous loading. How would it know the contents of the archive before it loaded the archive so it did not try

Re: [whatwg] Application deployment

2008-07-28 Thread Russell Leggett
Just to clarify, I wanted to point out that my suggestion is related to both of the suggested alternatives (mhtml and the jar protocol), but is very different in intention. I think there is a very real need in the area of deployment for resource intensive web pages/applications. The developer has

Re: [whatwg] Application deployment

2008-07-28 Thread Russell Leggett
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* Monday, July 28, 2008 10:56 AM *To:* Kristof Zelechovski; Adam Barth *Cc:* [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Russell Leggett; Philipp Serafin *Subject:* Re: [whatwg] Application deployment On 28/07/2008 09:22, Kristof Zelechovski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Having this URL monster

[whatwg] Application deployment

2008-07-27 Thread Russell Leggett
Hi all, I checked through the archives, but did not see anything, so if this has been addressed already, I apologize. This is a suggestion that is more helpful to larger single page web applications, but could also be very helpful to other resource intensive web pages. My thought is that it could