Rob,
I'm sorry for the late answer. The W3C DAP and WebRTC chairs have
discussed this, and come to the following:
- The WebRTC WG deals with access to live (audio and video) streams, and
also currently have support for local recording of them in the API
proposal [1].
- DAP has a note
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 07:30, Ian Hickson ian at hixie.ch wrote:
If you send two MediaStream objects constructed from the same
LocalMediaStream over a PeerConnection there needs to be a way to
separate them on the receiving side.
What's the use case for sending the same feed twice?
Wouldn't it be possible to abstract this away for the web developer? I.e.
the send method should, like for WebSockets, not have a max size. Instead
the sending UA would be responsible for chopping up (the receiving UA for
re-assembling) the message into packets not larger than the minimum
On Fri, 22 Apr 2011, Ian Hickson wrote:
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Justin Uberti wrote:
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 7:09 PM, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote:
This has made UDP packets larger than the MTU pretty useless.
So I guess the question is do we want to limit the input to a fixed
value
On Wed Apr 13 07:08:21 PDT 2011 Harald Alvestrand wrote
On 04/13/11 13:35, Stefan Håkansson LK wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Ian Hickson [mailto:ian at hixie.ch]
Sent: den 12 april 2011 04:09
To: whatwg
Subject: [whatwg] PeerConnection feedback
On Tue, 29 Mar 2011, Stefan H
-Original Message-
From: Ian Hickson [mailto:i...@hixie.ch]
Sent: den 12 april 2011 04:09
To: whatwg
Subject: [whatwg] PeerConnection feedback
On Tue, 29 Mar 2011, Stefan H kansson LK wrote:
The web application must be able to define the media format to
be used for the
-Original Message-
From: whatwg-boun...@lists.whatwg.org
[mailto:whatwg-boun...@lists.whatwg.org] On Behalf Of
whatwg-requ...@lists.whatwg.org
Sent: den 29 mars 2011 20:33
To: whatwg@lists.whatwg.org
Subject: whatwg Digest, Vol 84, Issue 69
I also believe that the recording
!The web application must be able to!If the video
is going to be displayed !
!define the media format to be used for !in a large
window, use higher bit-!
!the streams sent to a peer.
!rate/resolution. Should media settings!
!
All,
there are now two different sets of APIs public, one documented in the spec
(http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/dnd.html#video-conferencing-and-peer-to-peer-communication)
and one sent the other day
Some feedback below. (Stuff where I agree and there is no question have left
out).
On Mon, 31 Jan 2011, Stefan H kansson LK wrote this use case:
We've since produced an updated use case doc:
http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-holmberg-rtcweb-ucreqs-01.txt
...
The web author developing the
(Patrik has a couple of well deserved days off):
- In your experimentation, did you find any reasonable underlying
protocol to map sendFile, sendBitmap and their corresponding
callbacks
to, or did you just ignore them for now?
We just ignored them for the time being
- In connecting, did
Just to start the discussion, we put together the simplest use case you can
imagine (with an additional error case). It has been been sent to the RTC-Web
community before, but as there is some discussion on ConnectionPeer ongoing we
thought the use case could be of interest in this community as
12 matches
Mail list logo
