be implemented
is of no use.
Regards,
Stijn
---Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens Shannon
Verzonden: vrijdag 14 december 2007 9:07
Aan: whatwg@lists.whatwg.org
Onderwerp: Re: [whatwg] The truth about Nokias claims
Stijn Peeters wrote:
It does
Shannon,
What concerns me is that the removed OGG recommendation (specified as
SHOULD rather than MUST) was a step forward to the adoption (however
reluctantly) by corporations and governments of a set of formats that
require no royalties to encode, decode, reverse-engineer or distribute.
] The truth about Nokias claims
Stijn Peeters wrote:
Changing the SHOULD to MUST means that a lot of browser
vendors would not be able to develop a conforming implementation.
Again, this needs to be called out as being patently untrue.
They might *choose* not to develop a conforming implemention
Shannon,
You seem to have missed Dave's point. The removal of the paragraph
mentioning OGG in the spec does not change anything. The spec is a
work-in-progress and the video tag is still under discussion. As such, the
spec has been changed to reflect that no decision regarding this has been
made
Rachid Finge schreef:
The term 'lede' is more commonly spelled as 'lead' by journalists
throughout the world. It seems like a sensible idea, although I'm
wondering why you added the P element in your example.
I'm not an expert on this, but wikipedia distinguishes them (of course
wikipedia is
Sander schreef:
Křištof Želechovski schreef:
The acronym URL expands to Uniform Resource **Locator**”. The string
“print:#” does not match this spec: it is not a locator, it is a
processing instruction. BTW, the full form of the local URL “#” can
be viewed as “html:#” (whether it is allowed
Sander schreef:
Stijn Peeters schreef:
Sander schreef:
Křištof Želechovski schreef:
The acronym URL expands to Uniform Resource **Locator**”. The
string “print:#” does not match this spec: it is not a locator, it
is a processing instruction. BTW, the full form of the local URL
“#” can
Křištof Želechovski schreef:
href=print://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/ is no good;
it asks the browser to find the resource using the print protocol. But
the print protocol is for printing, not for finding resources; I
imagine it could be used for finding out some printer
Sander schreef:
Sander Tekelenburg schreef:
Your main argument for a print links seemed to be that some people might not
know where to find their UA's print command (hard to believe -- even IE by
default presents a shiny print button always).
Well, Opera doesn't show a print button for
Sander schreef:
Sander Tekelenburg schreef:
A lot of site owners just don't want to do that as it turns the focus on
the browser instead of their.
Well, tough :) Users matter more than authors. (See
,
Stijn Peeters
11 matches
Mail list logo
