Re: [whatwg] text/html for html and xhtml (Was: Supporting MathML and SVG in text/html, and related topics)

2008-04-17 Thread liorean
, loudly rejecting any content that is malformed. (And by publishing I include all sources: design templates, content producers, information from the database, advertisements, comments, trackbacks etc.) -- David liorean Andersson

Re: [whatwg] The div element

2008-02-29 Thread liorean
point. HTML4 outline hierarchy couldn't do this. Section is as I recall an idea imported from XHTML2. From what I understood, sections were originally meant to relate to sections of the information content as differentiated from divisions of the document structure. -- David liorean Andersson

Re: [whatwg] The truth about Nokias claims

2007-12-12 Thread liorean
. Yes. At a considerable profit, one might add. -- David liorean Andersson

Re: [whatwg] whatwg Digest, Vol 33, Issue 90

2007-12-12 Thread liorean
and XHTML5, only ever doing changes by addition. Or, under a different namespace. -- David liorean Andersson

Re: [whatwg] Fwd: Form Serialization Idea

2007-09-22 Thread liorean
. But if you scratch at the surface, you will find that in any browser, the barrier beween underlying application programming interfaces and ECMAScript interfaces is just evident in different places. -- David liorean Andersson

Re: [whatwg] Setting innerHTML to null or undefined

2007-06-04 Thread liorean
. Seems to me like they are simply using the ECMAScript ToString algorithm, unless I'm mistaken. That's probably a good thing to specify for this, too. -- David liorean Andersson

Re: [whatwg] fullscreen event?

2007-06-04 Thread liorean
you'd call it, so you can't say one overrules the other) then I can imagine such an event doesn't fit into the model. However, that also poses the question about how the CSSOM should handle this case... The same element may have different styles applied to it depending on media. -- David liorean

Re: [whatwg] setting .src of a SCRIPT element

2007-05-31 Thread liorean
modifying the src attribute. -- David liorean Andersson

[whatwg] Fwd: setting .src of a SCRIPT element

2007-05-30 Thread liorean
Mistakenly sent this to the public-html list instead of WhatWG. Sorry for the double for those on both lists. -- Forwarded message -- From: liorean [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 31-May-2007 07:24 Subject: Re: [whatwg] setting .src of a SCRIPT element To: HTML WG [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [whatwg] Request: Explicit grouping within dl

2007-05-26 Thread liorean
definition terms, and the messages consecutive definition datas, but there is no way to make one definition term span several couples of term-data couples of elements, which is needed for representing these example cases. -- David liorean Andersson

Re: [whatwg] Request: Explicit grouping within dl

2007-05-26 Thread liorean
On 26/05/07, liorean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: chatlog item /.../ /messages messages /.../ /messages /chatlog s/messages/item/ of course -- David liorean Andersson

Re: [whatwg] Scripting Tweaks

2007-05-25 Thread liorean
of hashCode to ECMAScript 3 implementations. I'm don't know VBScript and it's object model, so I can't say anything about that. -- David liorean Andersson

Re: [whatwg] Scripting Tweaks

2007-05-19 Thread liorean
as how common the incompatible Microsoft variant is? -- David liorean Andersson

Re: [whatwg] Scripting Tweaks

2007-05-18 Thread liorean
is processed, delete processed_elements[key]; to remove an element from the processed elements list, and something like for(key in all_elements) if(!(processed_elements.hasOwnProperty(key))) process(key); to iterate through the unprocessed elements. -- David liorean Andersson

Re: [whatwg] Tendious use cases for dialog

2007-04-04 Thread liorean
. It can also be in the other way - in a Skype chat only the first consecutive post from a person is tagged with their name, while all posts are tagged with the time. -- David liorean Andersson

Re: [whatwg] Full screen for the video element

2007-03-22 Thread liorean
Gervase just doesn't use a Mac, so he hasn't felt how lacking the support for full screen mode is in Mac browsers. -- David liorean Andersson

Re: [whatwg] Full screen for the video element

2007-03-22 Thread liorean
that functionality at all, or hacking it together by stopping the playback in the original window and opening a new fullscreen window with another copy of the video in. Especially if one wants to switch in the middle of the a video, keeping the playback going without interuption. -- David liorean Andersson

Re: [whatwg] video element feedback

2007-03-22 Thread liorean
) have a similar issue or not. -- David liorean Andersson

Re: [whatwg] window.opener and security

2007-03-20 Thread liorean
object would. -- David liorean Andersson

Re: [whatwg] video element feedback

2007-03-20 Thread liorean
the buttons automatically without scripting do the equivalent of the API function with the same name, and where the progress elements gets it's value from the video as it plays/gets buffered. -- David liorean Andersson

Re: [whatwg] window.opener and security

2007-03-20 Thread liorean
On 20/03/07, Thomas Broyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2007/3/20, liorean: Some thing I would like to add here, is that your solution doesn't do anything to solve the actual l problem case. Even if window.opener would be read only, that is just a reference to a window object. Even

Re: [whatwg] Versioning (was: Re: Using the HTML5 DOCTYPE as a new quirksmode switch)

2007-03-14 Thread liorean
liorean Andersson

Re: [whatwg] Using the HTML5 DOCTYPE as a new quirksmode switch

2007-03-14 Thread liorean
a browser check and forks will suddenly fail. And I think we all know that the vast majority of scripts out there aren't sensibly coded. -- David liorean Andersson

Re: [whatwg] Versioning (was: Re: Using the HTML5 DOCTYPE as a new quirksmode switch)

2007-03-14 Thread liorean
liorean wrote: Well, the original question wasn't about versioning in particular as much as it was Microsoft asking developers (not spec writers) for something, anything, that they can use to tell whether the author has written the document for HTML5 On 14/03/07, Elliotte Harold [EMAIL

Re: [whatwg] xml:space

2007-01-23 Thread liorean
sheet, so this whitespace is lost from ever being presented as it appeared in the document. -- David liorean Andersson

Re: [whatwg] xml:space

2007-01-23 Thread liorean
or not (it might be, but that depends on the poem content), you can specify it in that attribute. -- David liorean Andersson

Re: [whatwg] xml:space

2007-01-23 Thread liorean
On 1/23/07, Henri Sivonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Jan 23, 2007, at 17:45, liorean wrote: Well, considering the purpose of XHTML (main purpose is presentation for humans, no?) is there any reason to NOT just set it to default to preserve on the html element, fixed to preserve on the script

Re: [whatwg] E4X and attribute values

2007-01-16 Thread liorean
function anonymous taking a single argument event, starting in the InputRegExp scanner state like for any other FunctionBody production. So I doubt it makes much difference for the scripting engine either way. -- David liorean Andersson

Re: [whatwg] Side effects free scripts

2006-05-31 Thread liorean
On 31/05/06, Andrew Fedoniouk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - Original Message - From: liorean [EMAIL PROTECTED] From mathematic standpoint: By its definition Math.random() function is not side effect free in ECMAScript. It uses static variable for generation of pseudo-number sequences

[whatwg] WebForms 2.0 and object controls

2005-04-14 Thread liorean
Hello! Doing a quick read through the submitted WebForms 2.0 proposal, I didn't see at any place that it addressed object elements as form controls, something that HTML4.01 forms did. Shouldn't WebForms 2.0 address this part of the HTML4.01 forms as well? -- David liorean Andersson uri:http