On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 4:20 AM, Bruno Racineux wrote:
>
>
> On 1/26/14 3:39 PM, "Qebui Nehebkau"
> wrote:
>
> >On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 4:13 AM, Bruno Racineux
> wrote:
> >> What exactly do you find misguided, can you be more specific?
> >
> >Basically, - and I'm trying not to over-elaborate he
On 1/26/14 3:39 PM, "Qebui Nehebkau"
wrote:
>On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 4:13 AM, Bruno Racineux wrote:
>> What exactly do you find misguided, can you be more specific?
>
>Basically, - and I'm trying not to over-elaborate here, since my
>opinion isn't really very important - I just mean that I don
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 4:13 AM, Bruno Racineux wrote:
> What exactly do you find misguided, can you be more specific?
Basically, - and I'm trying not to over-elaborate here, since my
opinion isn't really very important - I just mean that I don't think
there should be any guarantees about how (or
On 1/24/14 7:37 PM, "Qebui Nehebkau"
wrote:
>On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 9:09 PM, Bruno Racineux wrote:
>> The requirement for ATs with 'hidden' is to access the structure of
>>hidden
>> elements. Not the presentation aspect... I am having a hard time
>> translating that a resources that is "not y
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 9:09 PM, Bruno Racineux wrote:
> The requirement for ATs with 'hidden' is to access the structure of hidden
> elements. Not the presentation aspect... I am having a hard time
> translating that a resources that is "not yet needed or is no longer
> needed" means that it shou
On 1/24/14 7:35 AM, "David Newton" wrote:
>On Jan 23, 2014, at 10:52 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
>
>> On 1/23/14 9:13 PM, Bruno Racineux wrote:
>>> Could 'resource control' be an associated spec of the 'hidden'
>>>attribute?
>>
>> It bothers me, at first glance, to overload the attribute to mean
On Jan 23, 2014, at 10:52 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
> On 1/23/14 9:13 PM, Bruno Racineux wrote:
>> Could 'resource control' be an associated spec of the 'hidden' attribute?
>
> It bothers me, at first glance, to overload the attribute to mean different
> things. I predict people will appear who
On 1/23/14 9:13 PM, Bruno Racineux wrote:
Then how come it is the case right now for both:
Gecko's preloader never preloads s. There are various reasons
for this, but the most important one is that in practice it doesn't
matter for actual web pages and hence no one has bothered to write th
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 6:13 PM, Bruno Racineux wrote:
> On 1/22/14 6:07 PM, "Boris Zbarsky" wrote:
>>On 1/22/14 8:14 PM, Bruno Racineux wrote:
>>> Meanwhile, is there a way in which all vendors can prevent their
>>> pre-loaders from preloading (and loading at all for that matter) any
>>>
>>> tha
On 1/22/14 6:07 PM, "Boris Zbarsky" wrote:
>On 1/22/14 8:14 PM, Bruno Racineux wrote:
>> Meanwhile, is there a way in which all vendors can prevent their
>> pre-loaders from preloading (and loading at all for that matter) any
>>
>> that has either: An html5 hidden attribute
>
>This is feasible.
10 matches
Mail list logo
