>
> On Mon, 10 Mar 2014, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
> >
> > This is also my question. Given that generating a path for a particular
> > context isn't a magic bullet *anyway* (because the details of the
> > context can change), I don't understand why caching isn't the answer.
>
> On Mon, 10 Mar 2014, Ri
>
>
>> I don't think the arguments for removing these are compelling. The
>> problems with the APIs have been addressed (e.g. there's no ambiguity in
>> the case of overlapping text), the use cases are clear (e.g. drawing text
>> around an arc or drawing a label along a line graph's line), and the
>
> > > You can do unions and so forth with just paths, no need for regions.
> >
> > How would you do a union with paths?
> > If you mean that you can just aggregate the segments, sure but that
> doesn't
> > seem very useful.
>
> You say, here are some paths, here are some fill rules, here are some
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 3:44 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
>
> On Thu, 28 Nov 2013, Rik Cabanier wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 8:30 AM, Jürg Lehni
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > I meant to say that it I think it would make more sense if the path
> > > was in the current transformation matrix, so it would
On Thu, 28 Nov 2013, Rik Cabanier wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 8:30 AM, Jürg Lehni
> wrote:
> >
> > I meant to say that it I think it would make more sense if the path
> > was in the current transformation matrix, so it would represent the
> > same coordinate values in which it was drawn,
