Re: [whatwg] Corrections for examples in section 3.14.10

2008-05-14 Thread Ian Hickson
On Sat, 29 Dec 2007, Ivo Emanuel Gonçalves wrote: > > On the examples: > > "Vorbis audio alone in Ogg container > > > > Speex audio alone in Ogg container > > " > > This should be: > > Vorbis audio alone in Ogg container > > > > Speex audio alone in Ogg container > > >

Re: [whatwg] Corrections for examples in section 3.14.10

2007-12-30 Thread Ivo Emanuel Gonçalves
For those not aware of what issue this thread is discussing, Xiph is implementing a set of file extensions to make sure implementations work as well as possible with different content encapsulated in Ogg. Those are: .ogx for applications .ogv for video .oga for audio Ogg files should use those fi

Re: [whatwg] Corrections for examples in section 3.14.10

2007-12-30 Thread Ivo Emanuel Gonçalves
On 12/30/07, Ralph Giles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't think it's a good idea to suggest people to start using .oga for > Ogg Vorbis files. The plan where Ogg Theora -> .ogv, Ogg FLAC -> .oga, > Ogg Ghost = .oga, but we keep Ogg Vorbis = .ogg as before makes more > sense to me. I'm not sure

Re: [whatwg] Corrections for examples in section 3.14.10

2007-12-30 Thread Silvia Pfeiffer
Ivo, all, Xiph has decided to make .oga and .ogv the extensions of the future, to avoid the current confusion between .ogg being in use for vorbis and theora files. The use of extensions is mostly to select between applications, so .oga for audio files and .ogv for video files make more sense beca

[whatwg] Corrections for examples in section 3.14.10

2007-12-29 Thread Ivo Emanuel Gonçalves
On the examples: "Vorbis audio alone in Ogg container Speex audio alone in Ogg container " This should be: Vorbis audio alone in Ogg container Speex audio alone in Ogg container Rationale: While Vorbis and Speex files (in Ogg) may use the .oga extension, it is far more