PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [whatwg] Entity parsing [trema/diaresis vs umlaut]
On 25 Jun 2007, at 11:44AM, Křištof Želechovski wrote:
> To make it explicit and plain: the dieresis is a diacritical mark that has
> no intrinsic phonetic connotation, although it is used most
mine ;-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Oistein E. Andersen
Sent: Saturday, June 23, 2007 11:28 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [whatwg] Entity parsing [trema/diaresis vs umlaut]
Sander wrote:
Only the vowel U can have either
f Of Oistein E. Andersen
Sent: Saturday, June 23, 2007 11:28 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [whatwg] Entity parsing [trema/diaresis vs umlaut]
Sander wrote:
> Only the vowel U can have either
This is not quite right. All Latin vowels (a, e, i, o, u, y) can take the
trema/diaresis
(ä, ë, i,
in E. Andersen
Sent: Saturday, June 23, 2007 11:28 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [whatwg] Entity parsing [trema/diaresis vs umlaut]
Sander wrote:
> Are there any char-sets that have both umlaut and trema variations of
characters?
Unicode does not make the distinction, so this is s
