Re: [whatwg] HTML Device element status

2010-07-06 Thread Bjartur Thorlacius
James Salsman wrote: > > [...] > is buffered, which would seem to exclude the > possibility of onchange=form.submit() in any of its forms' elements, > but is otherwise parsimonious, while is its unbuffered > counterpart. [...] > What about to request data to be automagically sent as s

Re: [whatwg] HTML Device element status

2010-07-06 Thread James Salsman
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 5:18 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > > There are some advantages with , but overall the design is ugly. is buffered, which would seem to exclude the possibility of onchange=form.submit() in any of its forms' elements, but is otherwise parsimonious, while is its unbuffered