I have a suggestion for HTML5 involving the currently planned doctype, !DOCTYPE HTML.
It came to my mind that there could be many a web developer, looking to create a basic webpage for friends, that might use the HTML 5 doctype thinking that the doctype is used, or even needed, just for basic
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 7:37 AM, mikemi...@verizon.net wrote:
I have a suggestion for HTML5 involving the currently planned doctype,
!DOCTYPE
HTML.
It came to my mind that there could be many a web developer, looking to
create a basic webpage for friends, that might use the HTML 5 doctype
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 8:27 AM, Tom Duhamel tom420.duha...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 7:37 AM, mikemi...@verizon.net wrote:
I have a suggestion for HTML5 involving the currently planned doctype,
!DOCTYPE HTML.
It came to my mind that there could be many a web developer,
Michael Ball wrote:
!DOCTYPE HTML5
Although HTML 5 consciously breaks away from HTML's SGML legacy, in
SGML terms, the first component of a document type declaration (i.e.
the first thing after !DOCTYPE) defines the document's root element
name. So if you used !DOCTYPE HTML5 then SGML
On 21 Feb 2009, at 12:37, mikemi...@verizon.net wrote:
If the doctype is !DOCTYPE HTML5 instead
Then Gecko-based UAs would be in quirks mode.
--
Geoffrey Sneddon
http://gsnedders.com/
