On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 12:33 AM, Boris Zbarsky bzbar...@mit.edu wrote:
I assume you meant mostly as in most of the pages are well-formed, not
pages are mostly well-formed, since the latter is useless, right?
I did a brief survey of obvious sites fitting those descriptions that I had
in my
Aryeh Gregor wrote:
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 12:33 AM, Boris Zbarsky bzbar...@mit.edu wrote:
I assume you meant mostly as in most of the pages are well-formed, not
pages are mostly well-formed, since the latter is useless, right?
I did a brief survey of obvious sites fitting those descriptions
On 11/11/09 11:16 PM, Aryeh Gregor wrote:
I'm pretty sure that XHR is used for screen-scraping beyond Wikipedia,
Since it'd fail any time the data is not well-formed XML, I'd actually
expect such usage to be rare. It's not all that common to find XHTML
on the web that happens to be
I already filed a bug
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8268, but figured I'd
copy it here to get more discussion.
Wikipedia just experimented with switching to an HTML5 doctype. A lot
of user tools broke, and after two hours of investigation, we
determined that the problem is
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 11:39 PM, Boris Zbarsky bzbar...@mit.edu wrote:
Since it'd fail any time the data is not well-formed XML, I'd actually
expect such usage to be rare. It's not all that common to find XHTML on
the web that happens to be well-formed XML.
A number of popular web apps
On 11/11/09 11:57 PM, Aryeh Gregor wrote:
A number of popular web apps output mostly well-formed XML, as far as
I know: vBulletin, WordPress, etc.
I assume you meant mostly as in most of the pages are well-formed,
not pages are mostly well-formed, since the latter is useless, right?
I did a
