[whatwg] IMAGE element (was XSLT: HTML 5 -- HTML)

2007-02-09 Thread Nicholas Shanks
On 9 Feb 2007, at 15:51, Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis wrote: Nicholas Shanks wrote: Yes, like OBJECT, but with a different name. A nicer name than IMG. One with three vowels. One that only accepts image/* content types. One with a more specific usage that can be controlled independently of OBJECT

Re: [whatwg] IMAGE element (was XSLT: HTML 5 -- HTML)

2007-02-09 Thread Anne van Kesteren
On Fri, 09 Feb 2007 18:43:17 +0100, Nicholas Shanks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I was originally just making an off-the-cuff hostile remark about IMG, but the more i think about it the more I dislike them pesky and restrictive alt attributes! They are, for one, backwards compatible. (Even though