On Wed, 13 Jul 2011, John Richards wrote:
>
> Are there plans to have an 'allow-plugins' value?
>
> I'm assuming there will be use-cases where the only protection that is
> desired is prevention of parent redirection.
On Wed, 13 Jul 2011, Adam Barth wrote:
>
> Adding allow-plugins today would d
On 2011-07-14 17:01, Jonas Sicking wrote:
...
True. I would be fine with removing the plugin requirement. Or
changing it such that it states that plugins can only be loaded if
it's done in a manner that ensures that all other requirements are
still fulfilled. Or just dealing with this once there
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 1:16 AM, Julian Reschke wrote:
> On 2011-07-14 08:22, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 9:49 PM, Anne van Kesteren
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, 13 Jul 2011 23:13:05 +0200, Julian Reschke
>>> wrote:
Yes, but we can *define* the flag in HTML and writ
On 2011-07-14 08:22, Jonas Sicking wrote:
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 9:49 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Wed, 13 Jul 2011 23:13:05 +0200, Julian Reschke
wrote:
Yes, but we can *define* the flag in HTML and write down what it means with
respect to plugin APIs.
It seems much better to wait
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 9:49 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
>
> On Wed, 13 Jul 2011 23:13:05 +0200, Julian Reschke
> wrote:
>>
>> Yes, but we can *define* the flag in HTML and write down what it means with
>> respect to plugin APIs.
>
> It seems much better to wait until it can actually be implem
On Wed, 13 Jul 2011 23:13:05 +0200, Julian Reschke
wrote:
Yes, but we can *define* the flag in HTML and write down what it means
with respect to plugin APIs.
It seems much better to wait until it can actually be implemented.
--
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
On 2011-07-13 22:58, Adam Barth wrote:
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 1:55 PM, Julian Reschke wrote:
On 2011-07-13 22:31, Adam Barth wrote:
Adding allow-plugins today would defeat the prevention of parent
redirection.
The short answer is we need an API for informing plugins of the
sandbox flags and
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 1:55 PM, Julian Reschke wrote:
> On 2011-07-13 22:31, Adam Barth wrote:
>> Adding allow-plugins today would defeat the prevention of parent
>> redirection.
>>
>> The short answer is we need an API for informing plugins of the
>> sandbox flags and a way of confirming that th
On 2011-07-13 22:31, Adam Barth wrote:
Adding allow-plugins today would defeat the prevention of parent redirection.
The short answer is we need an API for informing plugins of the
sandbox flags and a way of confirming that the plugins understand
those bits before we can allow plugins inside san
Adding allow-plugins today would defeat the prevention of parent redirection.
The short answer is we need an API for informing plugins of the
sandbox flags and a way of confirming that the plugins understand
those bits before we can allow plugins inside sandboxed frames.
Adam
On Wed, Jul 13, 20
http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/the-iframe-element.html#attr-iframe-sandbox
Are there plans to have an 'allow-plugins' value?
I'm assuming there will be use-cases where the only protection that is
desired is prevention of parent redirection.
Thanks
11 matches
Mail list logo
