On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 3:49 AM, Nelson Menezes
flying.mushr...@gmail.com wrote:
As an aside, there is a reason why AJAX has become so popular over the
past few years: it solves the specific UI-reset issue that is inherent
in full-page refreshes.
I'm trying to think what a solution to this
Aryeh Gregor schrieb:
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 3:49 AM, Nelson Menezes
flying.mushr...@gmail.com wrote:
As an aside, there is a reason why AJAX has become so popular over the
past few years: it solves the specific UI-reset issue that is inherent
in full-page refreshes.
I'm trying to think what
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 6:16 AM, Markus Ernst derer...@gmx.ch wrote:
Aryeh Gregor schrieb:
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 3:49 AM, Nelson Menezes
flying.mushr...@gmail.com wrote:
As an aside, there is a reason why AJAX has become so popular over the
past few years: it solves the specific UI-reset
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 7:16 AM, Markus Ernst derer...@gmx.ch wrote:
Interesting idea! Anyway it introduces some consistency problems to solve,
e.g.:
Page1.html contains:
static id=fooI eat meat/static
and links to page2.html, which contains:
static id=fooI am a vegetarian/static
So
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 8:50 AM, Aryeh Gregor simetrical+...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 7:16 AM, Markus Ernst derer...@gmx.ch wrote:
Interesting idea! Anyway it introduces some consistency problems to solve,
e.g.:
Page1.html contains:
static id=fooI eat meat/static
and links
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 10:16 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. jackalm...@gmail.com wrote:
Indeed, script changes should persist. The problem he was
highlighting, though, was the fact that a 'site bug' like that would
be very easy to have happen accidentally. It could even go unnoticed
by the site
