On 18.2.2015 0:15, Barry Smith wrote:
> I have read where the W3C has made the hgroup element obsolete,
> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/obsolete.html#non-conforming-features
> . I see the specification is still in the "WHATWG HTML: The Living
> Standard" specifications. Are there
On 18/02/2015 23:07 , Jukka K. Korpela wrote:
I recommend using the validator.nu service rather than the W3C one.
They're basically the same but the validator.nu one is closer to the
WHATWG spec's requirements than the W3C one.
The relationship between the two is somewhat obscure, but it is in
2015-02-18, 22:55, Ian Hickson wrote:
If you wish to create a valid and semantically correct document according
to the most recently published HTML standard, then using is fine.
I think you meant to say that is in the WHATWG document at
present (and you added that you do not plan to remove
On Tue, 17 Feb 2015, Barry Smith wrote:
>
> I have read where the W3C has made the hgroup element obsolete,
> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/obsolete.html#non-conforming-features
>
> . I see the specification is still in the "WHATWG HTML: The Living
> Standard" specifications.
On 02/17/2015 03:15 PM, Barry Smith wrote:
*snip*
As far as validation, a document with the hgroup element will not pass when
using the W3C Markup Validation Service.
>
> *snip*
Thank You For Your Time,
Barry Smith
WHATWG is not W3C
W3C dropped the ball (imho) and HTML became stagnant
Hello,
I have read where the W3C has made the hgroup element obsolete,
http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/obsolete.html#non-conforming-features
. I see the specification is still in the "WHATWG HTML: The Living Standard"
specifications. Are there any plans to remove this element
