Re: [whatwg] Please consider making summary more generic/flexible (or renaming)

2010-08-25 Thread Ian Hickson
On Tue, 3 Aug 2010, Tantek �~Gelik wrote: The name of the summary element however is too generic sounding of an element name for this special usage. I don't see why that's a problem. It is inevitable that people will begin using the summary element when they simply mean a semantic

[whatwg] Please consider making summary more generic/flexible (or renaming)

2010-08-03 Thread Tantek Çelik
Summary: the new summary element is very generic sounding but has a very special purpose (only allowed inside details). It would be helpful if we made it more generic, in particular allow use of summary inside article body (and perhaps section) to provide general summary text semantics (e.g. this

Re: [whatwg] Please consider making summary more generic/flexible (or renaming)

2010-08-03 Thread Andrew Hayward
Summary: the new summary element is very generic sounding but has a very special purpose (only allowed inside details). It would be helpful if we made it more generic, in particular allow use of summary inside article body (and perhaps section) to provide general summary text semantics (e.g.